Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
Nonstop gated CBCT for respiratory gating lung SBRT: A feasibility study
Mitchell Yu1, Sean Berry1, Yabo Fu1
1Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Background:
Free-breathing gated cone-beam computed tomography (gCBCT), which captures a specific anatomy coinciding with a preset gating window in the breathing cycle, is routinely prescribed to gating lung SBRT patients for pretreatment setup verification. However, a half-fan gCBCT scan can take 2-8 min (for a typical gating duty cycle of 30%-60% and patient breathing period of 3-6 s) on a C-arm linear accelerator because the gantry movement is interrupted and resumed by the respiratory gating signal multiple times over the scan. The long scan time increases patient on-table time, leading to discomfort and a higher likelihood of patient movement. Meanwhile, extra kV projections are acquired while the gantry is accelerating for the gCBCT scan, resulting in a higher imaging dose compared to 3D CBCT.
Purpose:
To investigate the feasibility of a novel imaging paradigm named "nonstop gated CBCT (ngCBCT)" that improves upon current clinical gCBCT by substantially reducing the scan time and imaging dose while retaining high-quality images.
Methods:
The ngCBCT is implemented by allowing the gantry to rotate continuously, with the kV x-ray beam activated only when the breathing signal falls within the preset gating window. Raw gCBCT projections of two gating lung SBRT patients were retrospectively retrieved and intentionally sampled based on each patient's breathing cycle to emulate the ngCBCT acquisitions. The datasets include both half-fan and full-fan acquisitions, representing the primary clinical scan geometries. Three reconstruction algorithms-Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK), penalized likelihood iterative reconstruction (PL), and prior-image-based iterative reconstruction (PIBR)-were applied to these ngCBCT emulations to evaluate reconstruction performances on the non-uniform and under-sampled projections resulting from this acquisition strategy.
Results:
The FDK reconstructions of ngCBCT are degraded with streak artifacts and have insufficient quality for clinical use. While PL yields improved reconstructions over FDK, the PIBR method consistently delivers the best visual and quantitative results with the aid of patient-specific prior images.
Conclusion:
The proposed ngCBCT technique addresses the key limitations of current clinical gCBCT by substantially reducing data acquisition time and imaging dose. The ngCBCT with PIBR achieves adequate image quality and offers a promising opportunity for pretreatment setup verification in gating lung SBRT.
More Related Videos
06:53Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
Published on: July 23, 2020
05:32Retrospective Cardiac Gating with A Prototype Small-Animal X-ray Computed Tomograph
Published on: February 21, 2025