Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Safety and efficacy of Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective
Behnam Shakiba1, Nasim Torabi2, Robab Maghsoudi1
1Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background:
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for large or complex renal stones; however, it carries risks such as bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines do not recommend routine pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in these patients due to concerns about bleeding and limited supporting evidence. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin thromboprophylaxis in patients at moderate to high VTE risk undergoing PCNL.
Methods:
In this retrospective cohort study, 202 patients undergoing PCNL were assigned to either heparin prophylaxis (n = 79) or early ambulation without pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 123). Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes-including bleeding, transfusion, complications, hemoglobin drop, and thromboembolic events were compared.
Results:
Patients receiving heparin were older (55.1 vs. 44.5 years, p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (median 28.9 vs. 26.5 kg/m², p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in stone size, location, surgery duration, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, or overall complications. Access tract length was slightly longer in the heparin group (p = 0.028). Thromboembolic events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.282). Notably, in the early ambulation group, one patient experienced deep vein thrombosis and two developed pulmonary thromboembolism (one fatal).
Conclusions:
Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin after PCNL appears safe without increased bleeding risk. While our findings suggest a potential benefit in reducing thromboembolic events in moderate- to high-risk patients, the limited sample size and retrospective design preclude definitive conclusions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

