Related Experiment Videos
[Radiology in chronic constipation in childhood].
La Radiologia Medica
|October 1, 1985
Summary
Diagnosing chronic constipation in children requires comprehensive evaluation. Total intestinal transit time (TITT) is crucial for diagnosis, while anorectal manometry (ARM) offers superior sensitivity over radiology for assessing constipation nature.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Surgery
Background:
- Chronic constipation is a common pediatric referral issue.
- Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective management and to rule out serious conditions like Hirschsprung's disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of various investigations for chronic constipation in children.
- To compare the sensitivity of different diagnostic modalities.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 113 children with chronic constipation underwent a diagnostic work-up.
- Investigations included anal inspection, rectal exploration, bowel frequency evaluation, intestinal transit times (TITT, SITT), contrast enema, anorectal manometry (ARM), and suction rectal biopsy.
Main Results:
- Functional constipation was diagnosed in 53 children, functional constipation with soiling in 32, and Hirschsprung's disease in 18.
- Total intestinal transit time (TITT) was key for diagnosis, while 10 children with normal TITT required no further examination.
- Anorectal manometry (ARM) demonstrated higher sensitivity than radiology in assessing constipation nature.
- Suction rectal biopsy proved reliable for detecting aganglionosis, with accuracy enhanced by histochemical/biochemical determination of Acetylcholinoesterase.
Conclusions:
- While bowel frequency indicates a gastrointestinal issue, TITT is definitive for diagnosing constipation.
- ARM is more sensitive than radiological methods for evaluating the nature of chronic constipation.
- Suction rectal biopsy is a reliable diagnostic tool for aganglionosis, especially when supplemented with specific biochemical assays.