Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition and Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Primary Results of the ENVAD-HF Trial
Maja Cikes1, Jasper J Brugts2, Brian Claggett3
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Insights
The ENVAD-HF trial found sacubitril/valsartan safe and tolerable for HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. This heart failure therapy showed a trend toward improved outcomes, supporting further investigation in LVAD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The efficacy of heart failure therapies in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients remains under investigation.
- Observational studies suggest neurohormonal blockers may improve outcomes in LVAD patients.
- The ENVAD-HF trial assessed the safety and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan for blood pressure management in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients.
- To compare sacubitril/valsartan against standard of care (SOC) in this patient population.
- To establish a basis for future pivotal trials on heart failure-specific therapies in LVAD recipients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label study (ENVAD-HF) was conducted.
- Stable LVAD recipients were randomized to receive either sacubitril/valsartan or SOC for blood pressure management (MAP goal 75-90 mmHg).
- The study included a 12-month follow-up with a composite primary endpoint and exploratory clinical, biomarker, and patient-reported outcome assessments.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint (time to death, renal function deterioration, hyperkalemia, or hypotension) showed a hazard ratio of 0.42 (p=0.30) favoring sacubitril/valsartan, though not statistically significant.
- Fewer primary endpoint events occurred in the sacubitril/valsartan group (2 events) compared to the SOC group (5 events).
- Sacubitril/valsartan use was associated with a significant reduction in blood pressure medications (p <0.0001) and improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (p=0.011).
Conclusions:
- The ENVAD-HF trial demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan is safe and well-tolerated in stable HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients.
- This study provides evidence supporting the investigation of Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in the LVAD population.
- The findings pave the way for a pivotal trial to confirm the clinical utility of HF-specific therapies in LVAD patients.
Background:
The role of heart failure-specific therapies in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients is unclear, and observational data suggest improved outcomes with neurohormonal blockers.
Objectives:
ENVAD-HF (Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group, Study to Evaluate the Use of Sacubitril/Valsartan in HeartMate 3 LVAD Recipients) sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan vs standard of care (SOC) for managing blood pressure (BP) in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients.
Methods:
ENVAD-HF was a prospective multicenter, randomized, open-label study of sacubitril/valsartan vs SOC for managing BP (mean arterial pressure goal: 75-90 mm Hg) in stable LVAD recipients with 12-month follow-up. The composite primary endpoint was time to death, deterioration in renal function, hyperkalemia, or symptomatic hypotension leading to drug withdrawal. Exploratory endpoints included clinical and biomarker assessments and patient-reported outcomes.
Results:
In 60 randomized patients (30 in each arm), sacubitril/valsartan compared with SOC demonstrated an HR of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.08-2.18; P = 0.30) for the primary endpoint at 12 months. Two primary endpoints were reached in the sacubitril/valsartan group (1 death and 1 symptomatic hypotension event) compared with 5 in the SOC group (2 deaths, 2 worsening renal function events, and 1 symptomatic hypotension event). Numerical trends in favor of sacubitril/valsartan were noted for other exploratory endpoints, including a reduced number of BP medications (difference: -1.09 [95% CI: -1.52 to -0.66]; P < 0.0001) and a significantly better Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary Score (improvement: +10.6 [95% CI: 2.6-18.7]; P = 0.011).
Conclusions:
ENVAD-HF, a prospective randomized controlled trial of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in stable HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients, demonstrated the safety and tolerability of this therapy in this unique population. The trial forms the basis for a pivotal trial to investigate the usefulness of HF-specific therapies in the LVAD population. (Sacubitril/Valsartan in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients [ENVAD-HF], NCT04103554; A multicENter, randomized, open-label, parallel group, pilot study to evaluate the use of sacubitril/valsartan in HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients, 2019-003888-22).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

