Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Frequency and Diagnostic Implications of Paramagnetic Rim Lesions in People Presenting for Diagnosis to a Multiple
Brian Renner1, Elizabeth Daphne Verter1, Martina Absinta2,3
1Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Background And Objectives:
Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are a well-established imaging biomarker of chronic active multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. PRLs have been shown to be highly specific for MS (∼90% specificity), and their prevalence has been estimated to be approximately 50% in patients with clinically established diagnoses of MS. In this study, we evaluated the frequency and diagnostic value of PRLs in patients at first clinical presentation.
Methods:
Adults age 18-64 years presenting with clinical symptoms or radiologic suspicion of demyelinating disease referred to academic specialty MS centers without a definitive diagnosis were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study. Phase images from high-resolution 3D echo-planar imaging were acquired on 3-tesla brain MRI and evaluated for PRLs by 3 independent raters, blinded to diagnosis, with adjudication from a fourth expert rater. Diagnostic performance of PRLs for a diagnosis of MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria as gold standard was evaluated using diagnostic thresholds based on the presence of at least 1 PRL (≥1 PRL) or at least 2 PRLs (≥2 PRLs).
Results:
Seventy-eight participants were analyzed (mean age, years [range]: 45.0 [18-64] female sex n = 55 [71%]); a total of 124 PRLs were counted in 36 (46%) of the 78 participants (median: 3 PRLs; range: 1-9 PRLs). Thirty-two (89%) of the 36 PRL-positive participants fulfilled 2017 McDonald criteria, and the remaining 4 (11%) had an alternate diagnosis. The presence of ≥1 PRL had a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.95) and a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.77-0.97). For ≥2 PRLs, specificity increased to 0.95 (95% CI 0.83-0.99), whereas sensitivity decreased to 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.75). For participants with MS, shorter duration from initial symptom onset was associated with higher probability of having PRLs, with the odds of being PRL positive (≥1 PRL) increasing by 28% for every 1 year decrease from symptom onset (odds ratio 1.28 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.59, p = 0.03).
Discussion:
PRLs are highly prevalent early in patients with MS at the time of first clinical presentation and can differentiate MS from mimics with high accuracy.
Insights
Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are common in early multiple sclerosis (MS) presentations. Detecting at least one PRL accurately differentiates MS from other conditions in newly diagnosed patients.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are established imaging biomarkers for chronic active multiple sclerosis (MS).
- PRLs exhibit high specificity (~90%) for MS, found in about 50% of diagnosed patients.
- Previous studies focused on diagnosed MS; this study examines PRLs at first clinical presentation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the frequency and diagnostic utility of PRLs in patients presenting with initial symptoms suggestive of MS.
- To assess the accuracy of PRLs in differentiating MS from mimic conditions at the point of first clinical presentation.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study of adults (18-64 years) with suspected demyelinating disease.
- High-resolution 3D echo-planar imaging on 3-tesla MRI to detect PRLs, evaluated by blinded raters.
- Diagnostic performance assessed using 2017 McDonald criteria, with thresholds of ≥1 PRL and ≥2 PRLs.
Main Results:
- Seventy-eight participants analyzed; 46% had at least one PRL (total 124 PRLs).
- Presence of ≥1 PRL showed 86% sensitivity and 90% specificity for MS diagnosis.
- A threshold of ≥2 PRLs increased specificity to 95% but reduced sensitivity to 59%.
Conclusions:
- Paramagnetic rim lesions are highly prevalent in early-stage MS presentations.
- PRLs serve as a valuable tool to accurately differentiate MS from conditions mimicking MS at initial clinical encounters.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

