Reliability, minimal detectable change, and standard error of measurement of functional tests for athletes: A
Thiago Teixeira Serafim1, Ana Paula Ramos2, Diego Ailton Prudêncio2,3
1Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology (LAPE), Santa Catarina State University (UDESC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Introduction:
Functional tests must be validated for the target population. It is also important that the professionals applying them know which tests are the most reliable. Some tests have a standard error of measurement (SEM), which needs to be considered, as does the minimal detectable change (MDC) used to quantitatively perceive clinical improvement. It is important to know the psychometric properties of a functional test to consider it suitable for its use. This study aims to synthesise values of psychometric properties of functional tests in validation studies for athletic or physically active populations.
Methods:
This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, SportDiscus and Cochrane in June 2025. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Consensus-based Standards for Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias checklist.
Results:
The final review included 49 studies. The study samples ranged from 11 to 243, totalling 1713 subjects. The mean age of the subjects studied ranged from 16.47 ± 0.51 to 59.40 ± 8.70 years. The reliability values verified by ICC ranged from 0.26 to 0.99. SEM and MDC values were delivered in percentages and absolute values. All studies evaluated using the COSMIN checklist were classified as "Inadequate."
Conclusion:
Functional tests used to assess athletes generally have good reliability values. However, standardisation in the application is necessary. The training of professionals who administer the tests is essential for greater reliability. Furthermore, greater stabilisation of the subject being evaluated is necessary for strength tests to reduce compensations during the test.
Level Of Evidence:
I - Systematic review.
More Related Videos
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
09:18Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
Published on: December 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:29Reliability and Validity
01:29Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
01:09Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...