Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Disparities in the uptake of learning disability (intellectual disability) annual health checks.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026

Same author

Watch Me Play!: results of a feasibility study of a remotely delivered intervention to promote mental health resilience for children (age 0-8 years) across UK early years and children's services.

BJPsych open·2026

Same author

Initial Testing of a Novel, Mental Imagery-Based Anxiety Intervention for People With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities Using a Single Case Experimental Design.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2026

Same author

Mother-Child Closeness Trajectories in Families of Children With Intellectual Disabilities From a UK Cohort Study.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026

Same author

Adaptation of behavioural activation for adolescents with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities and depression.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same author

Maximising the public health benefits of smokefree prisons: a synopsis from a mixed-methods study.

Public health research (Southampton, England)·2026

Same journal

Case Report: Subacute combined degeneration misdiagnosed as a primary affective disorder: diagnostic pitfalls and clinical red flags.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same journal

Virtual reality based attentional bias modification training for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a feasibility study.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same journal

Job demands and resources in relation to burnout and educational coexistence among Chilean education workers.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same journal

Correction: Sleep characteristics and cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: age-specific associations.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same journal

Systematic review of animal studies on the use of herbal medicine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Same journal

Alcohol and cannabis use severity in relation to compulsive sexual behavior and problematic pornography use in a non-clinical sample: a cross-sectional study.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

Estimating a minimum clinically important difference for the Developmental Behaviour Checklist - parent report.

Daniel L Sutherland¹, Emma L Taylor^1,2, Kylie M Gray^2,3

¹Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Frontiers in Psychiatry

|September 2, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study estimated the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Developmental Behaviour Checklist, parent-report (DBC-P). Findings provide benchmarks for interpreting changes in behavioral and emotional problems in children with intellectual disabilities.

Keywords:

Developmental Behavior Checklist (DBC)autism intellectual disabilities meta analysis minimum clinically important difference (MCID)

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Area of Science:

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Developmental Psychology
Intellectual Disability Research

Background:

Evaluating intervention effectiveness requires understanding meaningful outcome changes.
The Developmental Behaviour Checklist, parent-report (DBC-P) measures behavioral and emotional problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

To estimate the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the DBC-P.
To provide benchmarks for interpreting DBC-P score changes.

Main Methods:

Distribution-based estimates were derived from a meta-analysis of 21 intervention evaluations using the DBC-P.
Anchor-based estimates were obtained from 10 parent carers and 21 professionals using case scenarios.

Main Results:

Meta-analyses showed average DBC total raw score decreases of 3.01-4.73 in RCTs and 9.16 in pre-post designs.
Parent carers reported a median MCID of 6 (IQR 4-7), while professionals reported a median MCID of 8 (IQR 5-14).

Conclusions:

Findings contextualize DBC-P score changes relative to other interventions and stakeholder perspectives.
The choice of MCID value depends on the prioritized factors for a given intervention.