Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Effectiveness of question prompt list interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ruichen Han1, Jiayi Liu1, Jiarui Chen1,2,3
1Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of question prompt list (QPL) interventions in patients with cancer and to synthesize the delivery characteristics of such interventions.
Methods:
A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted for English-language randomized controlled trials published up to January 2025. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Eligible studies included cancer patients aged 16 years or older, with QPLs used in the intervention group to facilitate patient-physician communication. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to assess study quality, and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.
Results:
A total of 302 records were identified, of which 14 studies (reported in 16 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were categorized into two groups: QPLs with instructions and QPLs without instructions. Pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that QPL interventions significantly enhanced patient engagement in shared decision-making, increased the number of questions asked, and improved the perceived helpfulness of the material. Compared to QPL alone, QPL with instructions further increased the number of patient-initiated questions and improved decision self-efficacy.
Conclusions:
QPL interventions with accompanying instructions showed superior effectiveness in promoting patient question-asking behavior and enhancing decision self-efficacy. This review underscores the potential of QPLs-particularly those with instructions-to improve patient-physician communication. Further research is warranted to refine these interventions and explore their role in reducing patient anxiety.
Systematic Review Registration:
PROSPERO: CRD42024594145.
More Related Videos
09:19Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
08:57Sample Extraction and Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Doxorubicin and Mitomycin C Following Drug Combination Delivery in Nanoparticles to Tumor-bearing Mice
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Tumor Immunotherapy