Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
Published on: July 6, 2022
Spatial transcriptomics of retinoblastoma: a visual window on intra-patient heterogeneity
A P Moulin1, J Thevenet2, L Mazzeo3
1Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland. alexandre.moulin@fa2.ch.
Background:
Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignant tumor in childhood. Although current treatments offer a high survival rate, treatment toxicity, tumor relapse, and treatment resistance require a deeper understanding of the disease mechanisms to develop adapted therapies. Microscopically, this tumor is characterized by different states of differentiation and proliferation, ranging from poorly differentiated to well-differentiated retinoblastoma. Retinocytoma, on the other hand, is a benign non-proliferative tumor. Recent next-generation multi-omics analyses classified retinoblastoma tumors in subtypes 1 or 2, subtype 2 presenting a later age of onset, more genetic alterations, and higher metastatic potential. In parallel, several single-cell transcriptomics studies demonstrated intratumoral heterogeneity. However, mapping the different cell populations directly on the tumor and comparing histological features and molecular subtypes remains an unmet need.
Methods:
Spatial transcriptomics was used to characterize a primary enucleated case with two histologically distinct areas. The whole transcriptomic profile of sixteen regions of interest, covering the two differentiation patterns of the tumor and the non-tumoral retina, was analyzed.
Results:
The clustering of the regions of interest based on whole transcriptome data correlated with the histological description: cluster 1 (6 regions of interest) corresponded to highly differentiated areas and cluster 2 (6 regions of interest) to poorly differentiated areas. They showed enrichment for phototransduction and proliferation respectively, confirmed by immunohistochemistry for markers of these pathways. The publicly available molecular signatures of the two retinoblastoma subtypes categorized our regions of interest into two groups, which correlated perfectly with histological observation and transcriptomic profiles. Further analysis of the expression of specific senescence markers in the well-differentiated area did not support the diagnosis of retinocytoma as it did not confirm the expected up-regulation seen in this tumor type.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates a strong correlation between histological observation and molecular profiling, representing the first mapping of retinoblastoma composed of adjacent molecular subtypes 1 and 2. It also highlights the diagnostic ambiguity between retinocytoma and well-differentiated non-proliferative subtype 1 retinoblastoma and emphasizes the need for specific biomarkers to differentiate these two tumor types.
Insights
This study maps retinoblastoma cell populations, correlating histology with molecular subtypes 1 and 2. It highlights the need for biomarkers to distinguish between retinocytoma and well-differentiated retinoblastoma.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Oncology
- Genomics
Background:
- Retinoblastoma is a common childhood eye cancer with variable differentiation and proliferation.
- Molecular subtypes (1 and 2) and intratumoral heterogeneity are known, but spatial mapping is lacking.
- Retinocytoma is a benign, non-proliferative tumor, posing diagnostic challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map retinoblastoma cell populations spatially within a tumor.
- To correlate histological features with molecular subtypes.
- To investigate the diagnostic ambiguity between retinocytoma and retinoblastoma.
Main Methods:
- Spatial transcriptomics on a primary enucleated retinoblastoma with distinct histological areas.
- Analysis of whole transcriptomic profiles from 16 regions of interest.
- Immunohistochemistry for pathway markers and senescence markers.
Main Results:
- Transcriptomic clustering correlated with histological differentiation (highly vs. poorly differentiated).
- Subtypes 1 and 2 molecular signatures mapped perfectly to histological and transcriptomic profiles.
- Senescence marker analysis did not support a retinocytoma diagnosis in the differentiated area.
Conclusions:
- Strong correlation between histology and molecular profiling in retinoblastoma.
- First spatial mapping of adjacent retinoblastoma molecular subtypes 1 and 2.
- Need for specific biomarkers to differentiate retinocytoma from well-differentiated retinoblastoma (subtype 1).

