Uncovering internal water-flux and surface-potential dominance in hydrogel-based moisture-enabled power generation:
Huping Yan1, Liangyu Li1, Chuanshuai Dong1
1Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Conservation of Education Ministry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, China. qirh@scut.edu.cn.
Abstract:
Ambient humidity is an abundant yet underexploited energy reservoir, and its sustained conversion mechanisms remain elusive. This study employs single-layer, bilayer and ion-selective designs, in combination with Kelvin-probe force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulations, to delineate the fundamental physics of hydrogel-based moisture-enabled generators (MEGs). We demonstrate that continuous, directional water flux-rather than ion migration-governs electricity generation: the transport of 1 g of H2O through the hydrogel network yields ≈9.3 μA h, and vapor-phase migration alone sustains output over hours to days. Interrupting water transport (e.g., via carbon-membrane insertion or device sealing) extinguishes the current instantly. Moreover, the open-circuit voltage scales with the internal surface-potential gradient: increasing this gradient from 31.3 mV to 810.7 mV elevates the output by 2.5 times. Guided by these findings, we introduced a co-optimization strategy that simultaneously enhances water transport and amplifies the potential gradient, thereby increasing the voltage from 0.1 to 0.6 V. Further H+ modification increased the surface potential difference by 111.5 mV, improving the output by 30-50% and enabling sustained power under continuous water flow. Surface evaporation contributes solely by sustaining water flux, whereas triboelectric and streaming potential effects are negligible. This work establishes a quantitative mechanistic framework and delivers clear design principles for robust, high-efficiency MEGs, paving the way for self-powered sensors, portable electronics and distributed energy-harvesting platforms.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Considerations in Open Channel Flow
Gradually Varying Flow
Hydraulic Jump
Underflow Gates


