Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Triple A Plus (AAA +) Survival Prediction Model for Essential Thrombocythemia: Analysis Involving 7308 Patients
Ayalew Tefferi1, Giuseppe G Loscocco2, Lior Rokach3
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
A new risk score, AAA+, for essential thrombocythemia (ET) incorporates host factors and blood counts. This model improves survival prediction compared to existing scores, offering better risk stratification for ET patients.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Prognostic Modeling
Background:
- Essential thrombocythemia (ET) survival prediction relies on International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSET) and triple-A (AAA) scores.
- The AAA score uses age, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as risk factors.
- Need for improved risk stratification in ET patients to guide treatment and predict outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify risk variables for ET survival that are independent of the AAA score.
- To develop and validate a new, enhanced prognostic score (AAA+) for ET.
- To compare the predictive performance of the new AAA+ score against existing IPSET and AAA models.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a Mayo Clinic discovery cohort (658 ET patients) to identify AAA-independent risk variables.
- Multivariable analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) for identified risk factors.
- Development of a HR-weighted scoring system (AAA+) and validation in external cohorts from Israel and Italy.
Main Results:
- Identified AAA-independent risk factors: age >70 years, age 50-70 years, elevated ANC, low ALC, elevated absolute monocyte count (AMC), male sex, arterial hypertension, and arterial thrombosis.
- The AAA+ score demonstrated superior time-dependent predictive performance (AUC 0.92/0.91 at 20/25 years) compared to AAA (0.86/0.86) and IPSET (0.81/0.84).
- Validation in external cohorts confirmed the AAA+ model's predictive accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Host-related factors and complete blood count parameters are key determinants of longevity in ET.
- The novel AAA+ risk score provides a more accurate and comprehensive survival prediction for ET patients.
- The AAA+ model enables refined risk stratification, potentially leading to personalized management strategies for ET.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:35Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...