Evaluating large language model-generated brain MRI protocols: performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and...

To evaluate the potential of LLMs to generate sequence-level brain MRI protocols.

This retrospective study employed a dataset of 150 brain MRI cases derived from local imaging request forms. Reference protocols were established by two neuroradiologists. GPT-4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B were employed to generate brain MRI protocols based on the case descriptions. Protocol generation was conducted (1) with additional in-context learning involving local standard protocols (enhanced) and (2) without additional information (base). Additionally, two radiology residents independently defined MRI protocols. The sum of redundant and missing sequences (accuracy index) was defined as performance metric. Accuracy indices were compared between groups using paired t-tests.

The two neuroradiologists achieved substantial inter-rater agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.74). o3-mini demonstrated superior performance (base: 2.65 ± 1.61; enhanced: 1.94 ± 1.25), followed by GPT-4o (base: 3.11 ± 1.83; enhanced: 2.23 ± 1.48), DeepSeek-R1 (base: 3.42 ± 1.84; enhanced: 2.37 ± 1.42) and Qwen2.5-72B (base: 5.95 ± 2.78; enhanced: 2.75 ± 1.54). o3-mini consistently outperformed the other models with a significant margin. All four models showed highly significant performance improvements under the enhanced condition (adj. p < 0.001 for all models). The highest-performing LLM (o3-mini [enhanced]) yielded an accuracy index comparable to residents (o3-mini [enhanced]: 1.94 ± 1.25, resident 1: 1.77 ± 1.29, resident 2: 1.77 ± 1.28).

Our findings demonstrate the promising potential of LLMs in automating brain MRI protocoling, especially when augmented through in-context learning. o3-mini exhibited superior performance, followed by GPT-4o.

QuestionBrain MRI protocoling is a time-consuming, non-interpretative task, exacerbating radiologist workload. Findingso3-mini demonstrated superior brain MRI protocoling performance. All models showed notable improvements when augmented with local standard protocols. Clinical relevanceMRI protocoling is a time-intensive, non-interpretative task that adds to radiologist workload; large language models offer potential for (semi-)automation of this process.