Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Surveillance: A Scoping Review
Jimmy Smith1, David Dallas-Orr1, Niket Todi1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
Ultrasound and MRI show similar diagnostic performance for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) surveillance after surgery. Ultrasound offers significant cost savings, and hybrid protocols show promise for recurrence detection.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) requires vigilant post-surgical surveillance.
- Current surveillance methods often rely on advanced imaging, raising cost concerns.
Conclusions:
- Both ultrasound and MRI are effective for postresection STS surveillance, with comparable diagnostic accuracy.
- Ultrasound presents a more cost-effective option for surveillance.
- Hybrid surveillance protocols warrant further investigation for optimizing patient management and resource allocation.
More Related Videos
12:23Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
Published on: August 14, 2012
06:44Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
