Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Surgery, radiotherapy and endocrine therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer efficacy: a systematic review and
Wenwei Ying1,2,3,4, Zhenshan Ding5, Yuhui He5
1Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
In recent years, the treatment approach for metastatic prostate cancer has evolved, with early combination therapies increasingly being favored over androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. Despite the availability of various treatments, their relative effectiveness and safety trade-offs remain uncertain. Randomized controlled trials have explored a range of treatments for oligometastatic prostate cancer, but clear conclusions regarding their prognostic benefits and patient-centered outcomes have not been established. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to quantify the benefits of different treatments by analyzing data from a systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, covering trials up to October 1, 2024. The primary outcomes evaluated in this study include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and quality of life (QoL). This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022370203). We analyzed individual patient data from 13 eligible trials, involving a total of 2,524 patients. Our analysis revealed that ADT+ radiation therapy (RT) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.27-0.56]) and ADT+stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (HR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.21-0.58]) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to ADT alone, while no treatment showed a significant overall survival (OS) benefit. Safety analysis revealed ADT monotherapy had the lowest risk of grade ≥3 adverse events (TRAEs), whereas ADT+abiraterone increased toxicity (OR = 1.54). Limited quality of life (QoL) data suggested ADT+RT may offer slight improvement (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) 74.3%). Most trials exhibited low bias risk, though heterogeneity and small sample sizes for some comparisons warrant cautious interpretation. These findings support ADT+RT/SBRT for PFS benefit but highlight the need for further research to optimize survival outcomes and treatment tolerability.
More Related Videos
09:48An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...