Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Transactional Analysis Scale: A Sample of Nurse Managers

Ayla Tisinli1, Seyda Saydamli1, Merve Bat Tonkuş1

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

PubMed

Aim: This study aimed to adapt the Transactional Style Inventory for Managers (TSI-M) into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties among nurse managers. Background: Effective communication is a core competency for nurse managers, influencing both staff satisfaction and the quality of healthcare delivery. Since communication behaviors are shaped by ego states, reflecting internalized thoughts, feelings, and experiences, a valid and reliable tool is essential to assess these states in managerial contexts. Methods: The TSI-M was translated into Turkish using a standardized back-translation procedure and reviewed by a panel of experts. The sample consisted of 230 nurse managers (77% female) working in various healthcare institutions. Validity and reliability were assessed using item analysis, the content validity index (CVI), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: CFA supported the construct validity of the scale, yielding acceptable model fit indices (χ 2/df = 3.11; GFI = 0.90; AGFI = 0.90; CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.06; RMR = 0.06). Internal consistency was high for the total scale (Cronbach's α = 0.93) and good to be acceptable across subscales: parent (α = 0.895), adult (α = 0.812), and child (α = 0.836). While the parent and child ego state subscales demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity, the adult ego subscale showed slightly below-threshold composite reliability (CR = 0.692) and weaker discriminant validity. Conclusions: The Turkish version of the TSI-M is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing ego states in nurse managers and holds practical value for leadership development and communication training in healthcare management.

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.3K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
2.9K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
453