Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Enhanced Reproducibility and Precision of High-Throughput Quantification of Bacterial Growth Data Using a Microplate Reader
Published on: July 27, 2022
Measurement quality metrics to improve absolute microbial cell counting.
Kirsten Parratt1, David Newton2, Joy Dunkers1
1Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
Accurate microbial cell counting is crucial for various applications. This study introduces a framework based on ISO standards to assess and compare different cell counting methods, aiding in selecting the most suitable technique.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Biotechnology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate microbial cell quantification is vital for live biotherapeutic products, food safety, and probiotics.
- Current methods like colony forming unit (CFU), flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measure different aspects of cells, leading to non-comparable results.
- The lack of a ground-truth reference material hinders the accuracy assessment of cell counting methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and demonstrate a modified analysis of microbial cell counting methods based on the ISO 20391-2:2019 standard.
- To assess the performance and comparability of different cell counting techniques for microbial samples.
- To provide a framework for selecting fit-for-purpose cell counting methods.
Main Methods:
- A modified ISO 20391-2:2019 standard analysis was applied to microbial cell samples.
- Escherichia coli samples were quantified using Colony Forming Unit (CFU), Coulter principle, fluorescence flow cytometry, and impedance flow cytometry.
- Quality metrics were calculated for each method to assess repeatability, proportionality, and variability.
Main Results:
- The developed quality metrics were repeatable across replicate experiments.
- Significant differences in proportionality and variability were observed across the tested cell counting methods.
- Total cell counts showed good agreement, while viable cell counts exhibited greater variability.
Conclusions:
- The introduced framework and quality metrics aid in understanding method performance for microbial cell quantification.
- Interpretation of results can guide the selection and optimization of fit-for-purpose counting methods.
- This approach supports researchers in choosing appropriate methods for diverse applications requiring microbial cell count accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures

