Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Chemical Inactivation of the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cereblon by Pomalidomide-based Homo-PROTACs
Published on: May 15, 2019
The Role of CELMoD Agents in Multiple Myeloma
Niels W C J van de Donk1, Nizar J Bahlis2, Charlotte Pawlyn3,4
1Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract:
Although recent decades have seen continued improvements in survival for patients with multiple myeloma, the disease remains largely incurable, and most patients will experience relapse and/or become refractory to treatment. There thus remains an urgent unmet need for novel treatments, particularly for those patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Novel treatment modalities, such as targeted protein degradation, have attracted particular interest due to their ability to expand the range of druggable protein targets in myeloma cells. Iberdomide (CC-220) and mezigdomide (CC-92480) are promising oral CELMoD™ agents currently being evaluated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Preclinical data from lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-resistant cell lines and mouse models suggest that iberdomide and mezigdomide have the potential to provide therapeutic benefit even in patients who are refractory to lenalidomide and pomalidomide. The optimized specificity, potency, and safety profile of iberdomide and mezigdomide supports their clinical use and aligns with the need for longer durations of a well-tolerated oral CELMoD agent with synergistic combinability with other immune approaches (such as anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies) and proteasome inhibitors (such as bortezomib and carfilzomib). Although neither iberdomide or mezigdomide has yet received regulatory approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma, based on their mechanism of action and the data available to date, we propose that both drugs may be attractive options for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; based on their efficacy and safety profiles, iberdomide is likely better suited for use in newly diagnosed, first relapse, or maintenance settings, whereas mezigdomide may also be better suited for use in patients with early relapse or a greater number of prior antimyeloma treatments. Iberdomide and mezigdomide are currently being evaluated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma in several trials, and results so far are promising.
Insights
New CELMoD agents, iberdomide and mezigdomide, show promise for treating relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. These targeted protein degraders may offer new options for patients resistant to current therapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Multiple myeloma remains largely incurable, with most patients experiencing relapse or treatment resistance.
- There is an unmet need for novel treatments, especially for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
- Targeted protein degradation is a promising modality for expanding druggable targets in myeloma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the potential of iberdomide and mezigdomide as novel treatments for multiple myeloma.
- To assess the efficacy of these CELMoD agents in preclinical models, including those resistant to existing therapies.
- To explore the safety and tolerability profiles of iberdomide and mezigdomide for clinical use.
Main Methods:
- Preclinical evaluation using lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-resistant cell lines.
- Assessment in mouse models of multiple myeloma.
- Analysis of specificity, potency, and safety profiles.
Main Results:
- Preclinical data suggest iberdomide and mezigdomide are effective even in lenalidomide- and pomalidomide-refractory models.
- These agents demonstrate optimized specificity, potency, and safety.
- Potential for synergistic combinations with other myeloma therapies was observed.
Conclusions:
- Iberdomide and mezigdomide represent promising oral CELMoD agents for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
- Iberdomide may be suited for earlier lines of therapy or maintenance, while mezigdomide may benefit patients with earlier relapse or more prior treatments.
- Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating these agents, with promising initial results.
More Related Videos
07:24Repression of Multiple Myeloma Cell Growth In Vivo by Single-wall Carbon Nanotube SWCNT-delivered MALAT1 Antisense Oligos
Published on: December 13, 2018
09:41An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Differentiation of Common Myeloid Progenitor Cells
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...