Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

263
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
263

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A real-time detection framework for road cracks in noisy and morphologically complex environments.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Assessing surgical trauma in robot-assisted pelvic fracture fixation: the role of the systemic immune-inflammatory index.

Frontiers in surgery·2025
Same author

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and midazolam for general anesthesia in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Perioperative medicine (London, England)·2025
Same author

Impact of Image Preprocessing and Crack Type Distribution on YOLOv8-Based Road Crack Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Challenges and solutions of deep learning-based automated liver segmentation: A systematic review.

Computers in biology and medicine·2024
Same author

A hybrid Transformer-LSTM model apply to glucose prediction.

PloS one·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.7K

Adaptive force-position-speed collaborative process planning and roughness prediction for robotic polishing.

Ma Haohao1,2, Azizan As'arry2, Niu Jing1

  • 1School of Mechatronics and Automotive Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui, China.

Plos One
|September 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an adaptive robot polishing framework for enhanced stability and precision. The new method significantly reduces surface roughness, improving efficiency in robotic material removal processes.

More Related Videos

Convergent Polishing: A Simple, Rapid, Full Aperture Polishing Process of High Quality Optical Flats & Spheres
13:07

Convergent Polishing: A Simple, Rapid, Full Aperture Polishing Process of High Quality Optical Flats & Spheres

Published on: December 1, 2014

11.2K
Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
03:02

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Published on: January 17, 2025

470

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.7K
Convergent Polishing: A Simple, Rapid, Full Aperture Polishing Process of High Quality Optical Flats & Spheres
13:07

Convergent Polishing: A Simple, Rapid, Full Aperture Polishing Process of High Quality Optical Flats & Spheres

Published on: December 1, 2014

11.2K
Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
03:02

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Published on: January 17, 2025

470

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Manufacturing Engineering
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Robot polishing processes often lack stability and precision, particularly for complex geometries.
  • Optimizing process parameters like pressure, speed, and tool type is crucial for effective material removal.
  • Existing control strategies struggle to maintain consistent contact forces and accuracy during robotic polishing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an adaptive force-position-speed collaborative process planning framework for robot polishing.
  • To enhance the stability and accuracy of robot polishing operations.
  • To improve surface roughness and overall efficiency in robotic polishing applications.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a material removal model based on Preston's theory, incorporating polishing pressure, tool speed, feed speed, and sandpaper type.
  • Utilized an improved Dung Beetle Optimization algorithm, Back Propagation Neural Network, Finite Element Analysis, and Response Surface Methodology for parameter selection.
  • Implemented a curvature adaptive interpolation method for trajectory generation on curved workpieces and an adaptive impedance control strategy with PD iteration and RBF neural networks for force control.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) accuracy of 0.0001 µm in the roughness prediction model.
  • Demonstrated enhanced stability in the proposed force control method.
  • Reduced average surface roughness by 20.79% compared to baseline methods.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed adaptive framework significantly improves the stability and precision of robot polishing.
  • The integration of advanced algorithms and control strategies leads to superior surface finish and efficiency.
  • This research validates the effectiveness of the developed framework for high-precision, high-efficiency robot polishing applications.