Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Exploratory study comparing a single episode of feedback with regular feedback and no feedback on BVM ventilation
Graham McClelland1, Owen Finney2, Karl Charlton2
1Northumbria University ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4502-5821.
Introduction:
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major cause of mortality in the UK, with survival rates remaining low despite advancements in resuscitation techniques. The European Resuscitation Council and Resuscitation Council UK guidelines recommend controlled ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), yet studies show that ambulance clinicians often fail to meet these standards. In particular, hyperventilation has been linked to worse outcomes. This protocol describes a study that will explore the impact of different applications of real-time ventilation feedback on the quality of ventilations during CPR in a simulated environment.
Methods:
This exploratory simulation study will assess the effectiveness of real-time feedback on the quality of ventilations delivered by ambulance clinicians. Participants from North East NHS Foundation Trust will be randomly assigned to three arms, receiving a single episode of feedback, regular feedback or no feedback (used as a control group). Each arm will complete four simulated OHCA scenarios over six months, and their ventilation quality will be assessed at each session. The primary outcome will be the quality of ventilations, measured by rate and tidal volume, at the six-month mark. Secondary outcomes include trends in ventilation quality over time and participant characteristics.
Discussion:
This study aims to explore whether regular feedback improves the quality of ventilations during CPR and whether feedback sessions influence skill retention over a six-month period. Findings could inform training strategies, highlighting the role of real-time feedback in maintaining high-quality CPR skills. With a lack of prior research on ventilation skill maintenance in the UK, this study is expected to provide valuable insights into optimising clinical performance.
More Related Videos
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
08:34Investigation into Deep Breathing through Measurement of Ventilatory Parameters and Observation of Breathing Patterns
Published on: September 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...