Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
The effects of false feedback on state memory distrust towards commission and omission and recognition memory errors
Yikang Zhang1,2, Henry Otgaar2,3, Robert A Nash4
1Department of Criminology, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Freiburg, Germany.
Metacognitive feedback influences memory reporting strategies. Participants receiving commission error feedback became more conservative, while omission error feedback led to more liberal reporting, though distrust was not confirmed as the mediator.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Metacognition
- Memory Research
Background:
- Memory distrust involves subjective appraisal of memory, encompassing both forgetting (omission errors) and false memories (commission errors).
- The relationship between memory distrust aspects and memory validation or reporting accuracy is not fully understood.
- Metacognitive appraisals are crucial for understanding how individuals evaluate and utilize their own memory.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally investigate how metacognitive appraisals, specifically feedback on memory error tendencies, influence memory validation and reporting.
- To examine whether feedback regarding commission or omission errors affects response criteria in memory tasks.
- To explore the mediating role of state memory distrust in these effects.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 622 participants completed a memory task involving inaccurate feedback about tendencies towards commission or omission errors, or no feedback (control).
- Participants then underwent a recognition task to assess memory reporting.
- Response criteria shifts were analyzed in relation to the type of feedback received.
Main Results:
- Feedback indicating a tendency for commission errors led to a more conservative response criterion.
- Feedback suggesting a tendency for omission errors resulted in a more liberal response criterion.
- Manipulation checks failed to confirm expected changes in state memory distrust, and it was not found to mediate the observed effects.
Conclusions:
- Experimental feedback on error types can alter memory reporting strategies by shifting response criteria.
- The study's findings suggest that metacognitive feedback impacts memory reporting independently of, or without significantly altering, state memory distrust.
- Further research is needed to clarify the precise mechanisms linking metacognitive appraisals to memory validation and reporting accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Forgetting
Encoding...
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Hindsight Biases

