Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Key Elements of Photo Attraction Bioassay for Insect Studies or Monitoring Programs
Published on: July 26, 2018
The influence of illumination and cast shadows on prey detectability by predators
Lou Cauchi1, Keagan Reynolds2, Sami Merilaita3
1LLSHS, University of Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France.
None:
Many species use camouflage to dissimulate their true form and avoid detection or recognition. In natural habitats, the three-dimensional structure of an organism's body can present challenges for camouflage, as overhead illumination creates luminance gradients ('self-shadows') across the body surface and cast shadows (when light is blocked by the object itself) on the surface behind the object. While self-shadows are known to increase prey detectability to predators, it is unclear whether this is also the case for cast shadows. We used computer-generated prey and live fish as predators (western rainbowfish; Melanotaenia australis) to investigate whether the illumination conditions and the presence of cast shadows increase the detectability of prey. In the first experiment, the background contained directional illumination cues, while in the second experiment, targets were presented on a homogeneous grey background. In both experiments, we found that neither the illumination conditions nor the presence of a cast shadow (nor their interaction) increased the probability of detection by predators, despite differences in luminance variation among the different prey stimuli. Our findings suggest that cast shadows do not provide additional contrast to that produced by self-shadows and that cast shadows do not provide depth cues that increase prey detectability by predators.
More Related Videos
06:19Low-Cost Automated Flight Intercept Trap for the Temporal Sub-Sampling of Flying Insects Attracted to Artificial Light at Night
Published on: December 29, 2021
06:16An Experimental Approach to Investigating Effects of Artificial Light at Night on Free-Ranging Animals: Implementation, Results, and Directions for Future Research
Published on: February 2, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...