Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Evaluation of an Exclusive Spur Dike U-Turn Design with Radar-Collected Data and Simulation
Published on: February 1, 2020
Clear zone or W-beam guardrail for rural highways? A Full Bayes before-after evaluation by employing the Poisson
Shinthia Azmeri Khan1, Hassan Bin Tahir1, Shamsunnahar Yasmin1
1Queensland University of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract:
Run-off-road crashes often result in fatal and severe injuries on rural highways. Clear zones and W-beam guardrails are often installed to reduce run-off-road crashes and the extent of severe injuries. While the effectiveness of clear zone improvement and W-beams has been studied, their comparative effects in a similar empirical setting are not well known. At the same time, crashes on rural highways are often characterized by a high frequency of zero counts; however, models capable of addressing this issue-such as the Poisson-Gamma Lindley models-have not yet been tested in before-after evaluations of engineering treatments. Towards this end, this study aims to examine the safety effectiveness of clear zones and W-beam guardrails on rural highways by applying a Full Bayes approach with Poisson-Gamma Lindley model that considers heterogeneities resulting from the preponderance of zeros. A total of 82.70 km of treated roadway segments with Clear zone improvements (0-5 m to 5-10 m) implemented in 2014 and 2015 were extracted from Bruce Highway in Queensland, Australia. W-beam guardrails were installed along a total of 45.5 km of the same rural highway between 2013 and 2017. The computed Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) show that the clear zone widening significantly reduced total injury (CMF = 0.57), fatal, serious, and moderate injury (CMF = 0.58), fatal and serious injury (CMF = 0.53), and run-off-road crashes (CMF = 0.63). W-beam guardrails are also found to significantly reduce total injury (CMF = 0.75), fatal, serious, and moderate injury (CMF = 0.77), fatal and serious injury (CMF = 0.81), and run-off-road crashes (CMF = 0.56). Overall, both countermeasures significantly reduce run-off-road crashes and other injury severities, including total injury, fatal, serious, and moderate injury, and fatal and serious injury crashes. W-beam guardrails have been found to provide greater reductions in run-off-road crash occurrences, whereas clear zone improvements are more effective in reducing injury severity by offering more forgiving roadside conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Poisson Probability Distribution
The...
Poisson's Ratio
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...

