Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Concentration-dependent blood binding: assessing implications through physiologically based Pharmacokinetic modeling
Eman El-Khateeb1,2,3, Deeyen Karsanji4,5, Adam S Darwich4,6
1Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research (CAPKR), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. eman.el-khateeb@certara.com.
Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models reveal that ignoring concentration-dependent drug binding to red blood cells can significantly alter predictions of drug exposure, especially for unbound drug concentrations.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism
- Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling
- Drug-Red Blood Cell Interactions
Background:
- Concentration-dependent drug binding to red blood cells complicates pharmacokinetic assessments.
- Understanding how factors like hematocrit influence drug behavior is crucial for accurate dosing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare concentration-dependent and independent blood-to-plasma drug concentration ratios (B/P) using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.
- To evaluate the impact of hematocrit and dose on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics under different binding assumptions.
Main Methods:
- Developed and validated two PBPK models for tacrolimus: one with saturable blood binding and one with constant B/P.
- Simulated intravenous and oral dosing scenarios across a range of hematocrit and dose levels.
- Assessed differences in predicted drug concentrations (total and unbound) and area under the curve (AUC).
Main Results:
- Varying hematocrit (15-45%) for IV infusions predicted 6-9% differences in total blood AUC but 37-39% differences in unbound plasma AUC.
- Oral dosing showed substantial differences in trough (50-130%), peak (78-284%), and AUC (up to 125%) concentrations based on binding assumptions.
- Higher doses and hematocrit levels amplified the discrepancies between the two models.
Conclusions:
- PBPK models that ignore concentration-dependent binding may require compensatory parameter adjustments, limiting predictive accuracy.
- Accurate prediction of unbound drug concentrations and clinical outcomes necessitates accounting for saturable red blood cell binding.
- The choice of binding assumption in PBPK models significantly impacts predictions of drug exposure and variability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Incorporating Hepatic Transporter-Mediated Clearance
A recent model describes pravastatin's hepatobiliary excretion,...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...

