Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Medicaid Primary Care Utilization and Area-Level Social Vulnerability
Jordan Herring1, Yoon Hong Park2, Qian Luo2
1School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Medicaid beneficiaries in socially vulnerable areas have lower primary care access. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) identifies these disparities, highlighting the need for increased Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) support.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Socioeconomic Determinants of Health
- Health Equity
Background:
- Poverty concentration limits healthcare access in disadvantaged communities.
- Area-level socioeconomic indexes are increasingly used to address healthcare resource distribution.
- The association between socioeconomic indexes and primary care access remains understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the link between Medicaid primary care utilization and poverty/multidimensional disadvantage at the zip code level.
- To assess the utility of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) in identifying primary care access disparities.
- To compare SVI with income-based poverty rates for identifying disparities.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study using 2019 Transformed-Medicaid Statistical Information System data.
- Analysis of primary care visits (including Federally Qualified Health Centers - FQHCs) among Medicaid beneficiaries (<65 years).
- Regression analysis controlling for individual demographics, health conditions, and zip code-level SVI deciles versus poverty rates.
Main Results:
- Over half of 34.8 million beneficiaries lived in the top 20% most socially vulnerable zip codes.
- Beneficiaries in the most vulnerable areas (SVI tenth decile) were less likely to have primary care visits (8.9 pp reduction excluding FQHCs).
- Including FQHC visits mitigated the disparity (4.7 pp reduction), and FQHC use was higher in vulnerable areas (5.9 pp increase).
Conclusions:
- Medicaid policy should address geography-based disparities using multidimensional measures like the SVI.
- The SVI effectively identifies areas with barriers to adequate healthcare access.
- Increased investment in FQHCs is crucial for mitigating geographic inequities in healthcare access.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Secondary Healthcare System
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...

