Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
Occipital Monitoring of Patient State Index During Frontal Tumor Resection: A Feasibility Study
Ya-Xian Huang1, Wei Xiao1, Chun-Xiu Wang2
1Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background:
Frontal patient state index (PSI) monitoring is impractical during frontal lobe tumor resection due to surgical field interference. No validated alternative monitoring positions exist currently. This study evaluated the agreement between standard frontal and experimental occipital PSI monitoring.
Methods:
A SedLine sedation monitor was used to record frontal and occipital PSI values in 16 patients who underwent frontal lobe tumor resection. PSI data were collected at 2-second intervals starting from sensor attachment to headframe fixation. Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient. Subgroup analyses evaluated tumor laterality. A Passing-Bablok regression established predictive equations between frontal and occipital PSI at 7 critical time points.
Results:
Frontal and occipital PSI trends showed high temporal synchrony (P = 0.08) with a strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.805, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated excellent agreement (mean log-transformed difference: -0.02; 95% limits of agreement: -0.82 to 0.80). The intraclass correlation coefficient of all data was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.816-0.830, P < 0.001). Tumor laterality did not significantly affect frontal-occipital PSI differences (P = 0.382). A Passing-Bablok regression equation was derived to predict frontal PSI from occipital measurements: ePSI=0.37×(zPSI)1.28.
Conclusions:
Occipital PSI demonstrates excellent agreement with frontal PSI during frontal tumor resection, offering a viable alternative to obstructed frontal monitoring. Prospective validation via multi-center continuous intraoperative monitoring constitutes the essential next step.

