Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.4K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

148
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
148
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

223
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
223
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Moral decision-making 'on the fly'.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

When (and why) absolute decision attribute values influence human preferences.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Participants' Utilitarian Choice Is Influenced by Gamble Presentation and Age.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

The Effects of Activating Gender-Related Social Roles on Financial Risk-Taking.

Experimental psychology·2023
Same author

Are Impulsive Decisions Always Irrational? An Experimental Investigation of Impulsive Decisions in the Domains of Gains and Losses.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same author

Problem Gambling 'Fuelled on the Fly'.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K

The first attribute heuristic influences risky choice preferences.

Joseph Teal1, Petko Kusev1, Rose Martin1

  • 1London South Bank University, LSBU Business School, London, UK..

Cognition
|September 6, 2025
PubMed
Summary

People construct risk preferences dynamically. The First Attribute Heuristic (FAH) explains how focusing on the initial attribute influences choices, demonstrating preferences are made "on the fly".

Keywords:
Choice preferenceDecision-makingFirst attribute heuristicRisk

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

799
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.8K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

799
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Research suggests risk preferences are constructed "on the fly" based on context.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding the psychological processes underlying these dynamic preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and establish the First Attribute Heuristic (FAH) in risky decision-making.
  • To investigate the psychological mechanisms of "on the fly" preference construction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed the First Attribute Heuristic (FAH) based on binary comparisons of the first available attribute.
  • Conducted three experimental studies to test the influence of FAH on risky choices.

Main Results:

  • Participants showed increased preference for options with dominant values when presented first.
  • Findings support the "on the fly" construction of risk preferences.
  • Demonstrated the use of FAH in decision-making, leading to preference lability.

Conclusions:

  • The First Attribute Heuristic (FAH) is a novel explanation for dynamic risk preference formation.
  • FAH influences risky decision-making in ways not predicted by established theories like Expected Utility Theory and Prospect Theory.
  • Highlights the context-dependent and constructed nature of human risk preferences.