Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 21, 2025

High-Throughput Dissociation and Orthotopic Implantation of Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: December 20, 2024
PD-L1 Expression in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Cross-Clone Comparison Study
Venkatesh Pai1, Tanmay Wairkar2, Santosh Menon3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Purpose:
Recent immunotherapy trials of locally advanced cervical cancer report high PD-L1 positivity rates, whereas academic multicenter initiatives report lower PD-L1 positivity rates. These observations necessitate a cross-clone comparison to understand the observed differences.
Methods And Materials:
Two different clones, SP142 (BIOEMBRACE) and 22C3 (KEYNOTE-A18), used in previous multicenter international studies, were used to test PD-L1 positivity in a pilot cohort of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage III cervical cancer patients recruited for a phase 3 trial. SP-142 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were already available, and negative and positive samples were included in a 2:1 ratio. Biopsy material was processed for PD-L1 IHC using the clone 22C3 pharmDx combined positive score (combined positive score ≥ 1), with either antibody considered positive. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each antibody while using the other as the reference.
Results:
In this study, 20 PD-L1-negative and 10 PD-L1-positive (SP142) samples were included. The pilot positivity of the a priori selected cohort was 33.3%. The PD-L1 positivity rate was 36.6% (11/30) using 22C3. Among the 20 SP142-negative patients, 6 patient samples (30%) tested positive on PD-L1 IHC with 22C3, leading to a 70% negative predictive rate for SP142. Five patient samples that were positive for SP142 did not test positive for 22C3, leading to a positive predictive value of 50% when presuming 22C3 as the reference standard. The positive and negative predictive values of 22C3 (while taking SP142 as a reference) were 45% and 73% respectively.
Conclusions:
Our findings highlight the differences in PD-L1 expression when different antibody clones are used for PD-L1 IHC. Though the overall positivity rate was not different, there was heterogeneity at the per-patient level. Further investigation into PD-L1 expression is needed.
More Related Videos
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
07:43Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018