Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking
Published on: November 17, 2023
Family History of Prostate, Breast, Ovarian, and/or Pancreatic Cancer and Associations with Grade Reclassification in
Claire M de la Calle1, Yuezhou Jing2, Julia Fountain2
1The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Background And Objective:
The effect of family history (FH) on prostate cancer active surveillance outcomes is unknown. Our objective is to evaluate FH of prostate, breast, ovarian, and/or pancreatic cancer in a large prospective active surveillance cohort.
Methods:
Patients with recorded FH data (N = 1421) were selected. Association between grade reclassification to Gleason grade (GG) ≥2 and GG ≥3, and FH of prostate cancer (FH-Pr); FH of breast, ovarian, and/or pancreatic cancer (FH-BOPa); and FH-Pr and/or FH-BOPa in first-degree relatives was evaluated by a competing risk analysis. Association with adverse pathologic features (APFs; GG ≥3, seminal vesicle, and/or lymph node involvement) at radical prostatectomy was assessed with multivariable logistic regression.
Key Findings And Limitations:
Of the 1421 patients, 41/362 (11.3%) with FH-Pr, 37/336 (11.0%) with FH-BOPa, and 67/600 (11.2%) with FH-Pr and/or FH-BOPa were reclassified to GG ≥3. FH-Pr was associated with reclassification to GG ≥2 and GG ≥3 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.49 for GG ≥3 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.02-2.17], p = 0.039), as was FH-Pr and/or FH-BOPa (HR 1.52 for GG ≥3 [95% CI 1.07-2.17], p = 0.020). FH-BOPa however was not associated with any grade reclassification (HR 1.30 for GG ≥3 [95% CI 0.88-1.94], p = 0.190). In the 349 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, no FH status was associated with APFs. Our study is limited by having information on first-degree relatives only.
Conclusions And Clinical Implications:
Patients with FH-Pr had a higher risk of grade reclassification, including extreme grade reclassification (GG ≥3), but no FH status led to more APFs at radical prostatectomy. Patients with FH can safely be managed on surveillance, but might benefit from closer monitoring.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
13:19Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...