Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Future-Proofing European Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Market Access Practices Based on EU Learnings from the
Zilke Claessens1, Grace Beirne2, Catherine Decouttere2
1Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. zilke.claessens@kuleuven.be.
Introduction:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and market access actions were taken to expedite the market entry of COVID-19 medicines. This study aims to (i) capture multi-stakeholder views on these actions, and (ii) provide recommendations for future-proofing routine and health-emergency frameworks.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy makers/advisors (i.e. regulators, HTA assessors, and payers), and pharmaceutical industry representatives across Europe to elicit their perspectives on marketing authorisation and market access practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were transcribed ad verbatim and transcripts analysed via the thematic framework method.
Results:
The interviews (n = 16) resulted in an overview of stakeholder-perceived benefits and limitations for four key regulatory advice or authorisation procedures (i.e. emergency task force, rapid scientific advice, rolling review, conditional marketing authorisation) and one market access procedure (i.e. joint procurement) applied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighted benefits of the procedures relate to a reduction in timelines, enhanced collaboration and alignment, procedural flexibilities, and often a combination of these. Challenges are linked to inefficient allocation of time and resources for both industry representatives and policymakers/advisors and decreased transparency in certain procedures. In addition, several recommendations for the optimisation of both the routine and health-emergency healthcare framework were proposed. Emphasis is placed on the need for enhanced interaction and alignment between industry representatives and policymakers/advisors but also within stakeholder groups, development of more pragmatic and flexible procedures, and application of clear and transparent eligibility criteria for facilitating actions.
Conclusion:
This study provides an overview of the perceptions from regulatory, and market access practices during COVID-19, highlighting how these experiences can inform regulatory and market access practices both in routine times and during health emergencies. Taking stock of stakeholder reflections and lessons learned are valuable for improving preparedness and responsiveness in future health crises.
More Related Videos
09:30Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
Published on: March 17, 2023
07:43Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Drug Regulation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview