Stage 2 Registered Report Personal factors and group creative outcomes: A correlational meta-analysis
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This meta-analysis examined personal factors and group creativity. Self-efficacy showed a weak positive link, and time constraints slightly influenced outcomes, highlighting the need for better creativity measurement.
Area Of Science
- Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Organizational Behavior
Background
- Individual differences influence group creativity.
- Assessing group creativity effectiveness varies.
- No prior meta-analysis linked personal factors to group creativity outcomes.
Purpose Of The Study
- To conduct a meta-analysis on personal factors and group creativity outcomes.
- To investigate the correlation between self-efficacy and group creativity.
- To explore the moderating effect of time constraints on group creativity.
Main Methods
- Conducted a meta-analysis of 72 studies (n=11).
- Examined relationships between personal factors (e.g., self-efficacy) and group creativity outcomes.
- Assessed the moderating role of time constraints.
Main Results
- Weak positive correlation found between self-efficacy and group creativity (r=.04 to .67).
- Weak evidence for time constraint moderation (20 min > 10 min).
- Limited studies included due to inconsistent creativity measurement and personal factor assessment.
Conclusions
- Suggests a need for more systematic and direct measurement of creativity.
- Calls for improved open science practices in creativity research.
- Highlights the importance of considering personal factors and time constraints in group creativity studies.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...