Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
The Value and Reliability of Traditional Anthropometric Measurements of Cranial Deformity
Aslinur Uncu1, Serap Alsancak1, Yaşar Hüseyin Onganlar2
1Ankara University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Insights
This study compared measurement methods for infant positional cranial deformities. The 3D caliper shows promise for reliable and consistent cranial deformity evaluations, especially for asymmetric cases.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Anthropometry
Background:
- Positional cranial deformities are common in infants, but objective measurement tools for severity and treatment monitoring are lacking.
- Anthropometric measurements are practical for assessing cranial deformities and guiding helmet therapy, despite debated accuracy.
- Current methods for measuring infant head shape lack standardized validation, impacting treatment consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of different anthropometric measurement methods for positional cranial deformities.
- To compare traditional metal calipers, 3D calipers, and 3D scan data (TALEE program) for accuracy.
- To determine the most consistent and reliable method for clinical use in evaluating infant cranial asymmetry.
Main Methods:
- Infants with plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and asymmetric brachycephaly were measured using metal calipers, 3D calipers, and 3D scanning (TALEE).
- Key parameters included right frontal-left occipital diameter (ft-ld), left ft-right ld, cranial width, and length.
- Statistical analysis involved calculating means, standard deviations, variances, and Pearson correlation coefficients.
Main Results:
- Cranial width measurement demonstrated the highest consistency, followed by left ft-right ld and cranial length.
- A strong correlation (r >0.90, P <0.01) was observed between 3D caliper and TALEE measurements in asymmetric brachycephaly.
- No significant differences in mean and SD were found between metal and 3D caliper measurements, but 3D calipers showed less variability.
Conclusions:
- The 3D caliper method appears to offer more reliable and consistent measurements for cranial deformity assessment.
- The 3D caliper may be preferable for clinical applications, particularly in managing asymmetric cranial deformities.
- Further validation of 3D caliper use could standardize the evaluation and treatment of positional plagiocephaly and other deformities.
Abstract:
Positional cranial deformities are frequently observed in early infancy. The lack of a clinically proven measure to quantify the severity and change of positional cranial deformities makes the treatment of cranial deformities controversial. The use of anthropometric measurements is a recommended method. Although anthropometric measurements with calipers have controversial anthropometric measurement values in the literature, it remains the most practical and cheapest tool for deciding on a cranial helmet and monitoring the effectiveness of the helmet. In this study, the reliability and validity of this measurement method were investigated. Traditional anthropometric measurements of the infants' heads were taken by one researcher while the second researcher scanned the infant's head and determined the anthropometric values in the scan. Cranial measurements of metal calipers, 3D calipers and scan data using the TALEE program were compared in infants diagnosed with plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and asymmetric brachycephaly. Right ft-left ld, left ft-right ld, left ft-right ld, cranial width and length values were evaluated as measurement parameters and mean, SD, variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for each measurement method. It was found that the highest consistency was obtained in the cranial width measurement, followed by left ft-right ld and cranial length measurements, respectively. A high correlation ( r >0.90, P <0.01) was found between the 3D caliper and TALEE measurements in the asymmetric brachycephaly group, while the 3D caliper showed lower variability in the plagiocephaly and brachycephaly groups. When the mean and SD values were analyzed, no statistically significant difference was found between metal caliper and 3D caliper measurements. It is thought that the 3D caliper method may provide more reliable and consistent measurements in cranial deformity evaluations and may be preferred for clinical use, especially in asymmetric deformities.
More Related Videos
10:23Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025