Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Comparative Safety Profiles of Ocrelizumab and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Using Real-World Evidence
Gabriel Cerono1, Bruce A C Cree1, Stephen L Hauser1
1Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to compare the long-term safety profiles of ocrelizumab and rituximab in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods:
Using retrospective data from the University of California (UC) Health System, we simulated a target clinical trial. The primary cohort from UC San Francisco (UCSF) and a validation cohort from 5 other UC Medical Centers were analyzed. After applying exclusion criteria and propensity score matching based on disease characteristics, demographics, and socioeconomic factors, we compared UCSF patients receiving ocrelizumab (n = 542) and rituximab (n = 271)and validated in the UC-wide MS population (n = 486 and n = 162 patients, respectively). The primary outcome was an all-cause hospitalization rate; secondary outcomes included hypogammaglobulinemia development and infection incidence.
Results:
Rituximab showed higher all-cause hospitalization rates compared to ocrelizumab in both UCSF (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.37-3.82, p = 0.001) and UC-wide cohorts (IRR = 4.54, 95% CI = 4.30-7.61, p < 0.001). Cumulative hazard ratios (HRs) were similarly elevated with rituximab at UCSF (HR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.37-3.75, p = 0.001) and UC-wide (HR = 4.01, 95% CI = 2.25-6.32, p < 0.001). The risk of developing hypogammaglobulinemia was higher with rituximab at both UCSF (HR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.18-6.29, p = 0.003) and UC-wide (HR = 4.79, 95% CI = 2.04-11.25, p < 0.001).
Interpretation:
A more favorable safety profile was observed for ocrelizumab, with lower rates of hospitalization and hypogammaglobulinemia across 2 independent cohorts. These findings may help guide treatment strategies in persons with MS. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:248-260.
More Related Videos
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Overview and Classification
Relative Risk