Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

A Novel Approach for the Administration of Medications and Fluids in Emergency Scenarios and Settings
Published on: November 9, 2016
Pain, Agitation, Delirium, and Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome Management in Children Who Are Critically Ill: Protocol
Ibo MacDonald1, Alexia Cavin-Trombert2, Cécile Jaques2
1Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Insights
This study outlines a European guideline development process for managing pain, sedation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) in critically ill children. The patient- and family-informed approach ensures a credible and context-specific guideline.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine
- Clinical Guideline Development
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Pain, sedation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) are interrelated conditions in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).
- Existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) require updates with new evidence and adaptation for the European context.
- There is a need for a comprehensive, patient- and family-informed guideline for managing these conditions in critically ill children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the development protocol for the first European guideline on managing pain, sedation, delirium, and IWS in critically ill children.
- To incorporate patient and family perspectives throughout the guideline development process.
- To ensure the guideline is evidence-based, credible, and tailored to the European healthcare setting.
Main Methods:
- The guideline development follows the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach over seven phases.
- Key phases include establishing diverse working groups (experts, patient/family partners), evidence identification and synthesis, and guideline drafting and review.
- A systematic approach was used to compile existing recommendations, identify research gaps, and prioritize outcomes for new evidence synthesis.
Main Results:
- The protocol successfully recruited 21 clinical experts and 17 patient/family partners, finalizing the guideline scope.
- A total of 23 summary recommendations and 17 new research questions were selected, with 4 new questions aligning with existing recommendations.
- The guideline is anticipated for publication by spring 2026, including detailed search strategies, evidence-to-decision frameworks, and finalized recommendations.
Conclusions:
- This protocol ensures a transparent and rigorous GRADE-based development process for a European guideline.
- The inclusion of patient and family partners enhances the guideline's trustworthiness and relevance.
- The resulting guideline will provide a credible framework for managing pain, sedation, delirium, and IWS in critically ill children within the European context.
Background:
In pediatric intensive care units, pain, sedation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) must be managed as interrelated conditions. Although clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist, new evidence needs to be incorporated, gaps in recommendations addressed, and recommendations adapted to the European context.
Objective:
This protocol describes the development of the first patient- and family-informed European guideline for managing pain, sedation, delirium, and IWS by the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care.
Methods:
This guideline will follow the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation ADOLOPMENT approach across seven phases: (1) setup-establish 3 groups, namely a steering committee, development panel (experts and patient and family partners), and patient and family partner advisory panel, to define guideline scope through voting and consensus; (2) preparation-vote on 30 summary recommendations compiled from existing CPGs of medium quality or above; prioritize new research questions; update the search for CPGs to match new research questions with recommendations using population, intervention, comparator, and outcome elements; prioritize outcomes for effectiveness questions using a 9-point Likert scale; with validation from patient and family partners; (3) evidence identification, analysis, and data extraction-develop individualized search strategies for each research question (2 independent appraisers will select and appraise studies and conduct data extraction); (4) evidence synthesis-expert pairs will summarize findings in evidence profiles and evidence-to-decision (EtD) frameworks (in the absence of evidence, the expert panel will be surveyed to assess current practices); (5) guideline development-expert pairs will draft recommendations, then topic-specific subgroups will reach consensus before full development panel voting (>80% approval needed; subgroups will determine the need for additional supporting content); (6) review-conduct internal, society-level, and external international expert reviews using surveys with Likert scales and open-ended comments; and (7) issue and update-publish the guideline and monitor literature to assess the need for updates before 5 years.
Results:
In phase 1, a total of 21 clinical experts and 17 patient and family partners were recruited, and the guideline scope was finalized with 80% to 100% agreement. In phase 2, a total of 23 summary recommendations and 17 new research questions (total=40) were selected. The updated CPG search identified 2 low-quality CPGs, which were excluded from recommendation matching. Of the 17 new research questions, 4 matched existing recommendations. Of the 3 effectiveness questions, one had 7 prioritized outcomes, whereas two had 9 outcomes for inclusion in EtD frameworks. The final CPG is expected by spring 2026, with search strategies, EtD frameworks, and recommendations included.
Conclusions:
This protocol ensures a transparent Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-based development process, leading to a trustworthy and credible guideline tailored to the European context for managing pain, sedation, delirium, and IWS in children who are critically ill.
International Registered Report Identifier (Irrid):
DERR1-10.2196/67930.
More Related Videos
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Irritable Bowel Syndrome III: Medical and Nursing Management