Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

5.4K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
5.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply: Primary graft failure in preloaded vs surgeon prepared DSAEK: a clinical and ex vivo correlation study.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same author

Accuracy of toric intraocular lens realignment calculators: A vector-based bivariate comparison of current calculation methods.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

A 5-year review of fungal keratitis in Oklahoma.

Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society·2026
Same author

Microbial keratitis in transition: From traditional paradigms to emerging solutions.

Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society·2026
Same author

Ray-Tracing-Based Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Combined Cataract Surgery and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery Using Zeiss Artificial Intelligence Calculator versus Barrett Universal II and Kane.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

576

Refractive Outcomes Using Simulated Keratometry Versus Keratometry From an Optical Biometer.

David L Cooke1, Karanpreet S Multani2, Jascha A Wendelstein3

  • 1From the Great Lakes Eye Care (D.L.C.), Saint Joseph, Michigan, USA; Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology (D.L.C.), Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

American Journal of Ophthalmology
|September 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The IOLMaster 700 provided more accurate refractive predictions than the Pentacam AXL for intraocular lens calculations. Standard keratometry (K) measurements from the IOLMaster 700 outperformed simulated keratometry (Sim K) from the Pentacam AXL.

More Related Videos

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
05:46

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity

Published on: September 20, 2024

780

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

576
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.7K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
05:46

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity

Published on: September 20, 2024

780

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optical Science

Background:

  • Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for achieving desired refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
  • Different biometry devices and keratometry measurements can influence refractive prediction accuracy.
  • Scheimpflug tomography (Simulated Keratometry - Sim K) and telecentric keratometry (Keratometry - K) are common methods for obtaining corneal power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of modern IOL power calculation formulas using simulated keratometry (Sim K) from a Scheimpflug tomographer versus keratometry (K) from an optical biometer.
  • To evaluate the impact of different biometric data sources on IOL formula performance.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 589 eyes undergoing cataract surgery with monofocal IOL implantation.
  • Comparison of refractive prediction errors using nine IOL formulas with three biometric data sources: IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700), Pentacam AXL, and a combination.
  • Assessment of accuracy using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).

Main Results:

  • All nine formulas showed superior refractive prediction accuracy with IOLMaster 700 (IOLM700) biometry compared to Pentacam AXL biometry.
  • The IOLM700 approach yielded significantly lower MAE and RMSE than the combination and Pentacam AXL approaches (P < .05).
  • Formula performance varied based on the biometry source, with Cooke K6 ranking highest for IOLM700 and EVO 2.0 for Pentacam AXL and the combination.

Conclusions:

  • Biometric data, including standard K from the IOLMaster 700, provides the most accurate refractive predictions for IOL power calculations.
  • Simulated Keratometry (Sim K) values from the Pentacam AXL are not directly interchangeable with standard K values from SS-OCT biometers.
  • The choice of biometry device and optimization significantly impacts IOL formula performance and refractive outcomes.