Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary
Johann Bill Pinedo-Avila1, Jessica Lucia Valera-Cabrera2, Ana Avalos-Rodríguez3
1Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Neurocirugía del Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima, Peru.
Insights
Ticagrelor and clopidogrel show similar efficacy for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Ticagrelor may increase chest pain, but other safety outcomes appear comparable.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend clopidogrel for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Comparative efficacy and safety data between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in this population remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in patients with CCS undergoing PCI.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to inform clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sourced from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases up to February 15, 2025.
- Included adults with CCS undergoing PCI, comparing ticagrelor maintenance therapy against clopidogrel.
- Primary outcomes included mortality, myocardial infarction, quality of life, heart failure, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), revascularization, and adverse events, assessed using the GRADE approach for certainty of evidence.
Main Results:
- Nine RCTs involving 3370 patients were analyzed.
- Ticagrelor demonstrated probable similar efficacy to clopidogrel regarding cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, heart failure, stroke/TIA, and revascularization, though evidence for some outcomes was very uncertain.
- Ticagrelor showed probable similar safety profiles for bleeding events but likely increased the risk of chest pain/tightness (7.5 per 100 patients).
Conclusions:
- Ticagrelor exhibits comparable efficacy to clopidogrel for most cardiovascular outcomes in CCS patients undergoing PCI.
- The safety profiles are largely similar, with a notable increase in the incidence of chest pain/tightness associated with ticagrelor.
- Further research may be needed to clarify uncertainties regarding specific cardiovascular events and long-term outcomes.
Background:
Current guidelines recommend clopidogrel in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet the comparative benefits are unclear.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with CCS undergoing PCI.
Methods:
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL databases from inception to February 15, 2025. We included parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with CCS undergoing PCI, where the intervention group received ticagrelor as maintenance therapy and the control group received clopidogrel. Primary outcomes included all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, quality of life, heart failure, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), revascularization, and adverse events. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently. We determined the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
Results:
We included nine RCTs, with 3370 patients. Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor probably results in no important difference in cardiovascular mortality and hospital stay; may not have an important effect on stroke and/or TIA; and may not have an important effect on all-cause mortality, heart failure, and revascularization, but the evidence is very uncertain. Additionally, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect on myocardial infarction. Regarding safety outcomes, ticagrelor probably results in no important difference in major bleeding, minor bleeding, any bleeding, or dyspnea. However, it probably increases the risk of chest pain/tightness ( + 7.5 per 100; 95% CI: +1.4 to +21.7).
Conclusion:
In patients with CCS undergoing PCI, ticagrelor probably has a similar efficacy and safety to clopidogrel in most cardiovascular outcomes. However, it probably increases the risk of chest pain/tightness.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management

