Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Training Pathways for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An Analysis of Residencies and Matched FMIGS Trainees
Petra C Voigt1, Meghna Gaddam2, Courtney Thompson2
1Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Objective:
To better understand the training environment in Minimally invasive Gynecologic Surgery (MIGS) among obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residency programs and the educational pathway to securing an FMIGS (Fellowship in MIGS) fellowship.
Design:
Observational, cross-sectional study utilizing data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for OBGYN residency programs and both ACGME- and AAGL-accredited gynecologic fellowships. Outcomes included the proportion of residency programs with affiliated FMIGS fellowships or MIGS divisions, the number of FMIGS fellows who trained at such programs, and trends in residency-to-fellowship transitions over a five-year period.
Setting:
Not applicable as this was a survey study for all residency programs in the United States.
Participants:
All United States-based ACGME-accredited OBGYN residency programs and ACGME- and AAGL-accredited gynecologic fellowships from 2022 to 2026 were included. FMIGS fellows were identified using publicly available annual match lists published by the AAGL for fellowship years 2022 to 2026.
Results:
Among 298 OBGYN residency programs, 46 (15%) had an affiliated FMIGS fellowship, less than gynecologic oncology (n = 74), Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) (n = 58) and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) (n = 51). Another 22 residency programs (9%) had a co-located MIGS division without a fellowship. From 2022 to 2026, 227 residents matched into FMIGS fellowships. Of these, 53% trained at residencies with FMIGS programs, and 9% trained at residencies with MIGS divisions but no co-located FMIGS fellowship. In total, 35% of residency programs had at least one resident match into FMIGS during the study period, indicating variability in program output.
Conclusions:
Overall, residency programs with co-located FMIGS fellowships or MIGS divisions appear to enhance fellowship match success.
More Related Videos
09:51Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
Published on: March 21, 2018
08:34Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
Published on: October 17, 2025