Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Measuring Light-Switching Behavior Using an Occupancy and Light Data Logger
Published on: January 16, 2020
Advice-taking in carbon footprint assessments: How psychological and cultural factors shape reliance on experts'
Irmak Sancar1, Kenzo Nera2,3, Céline Schöpfer4
1Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center of Cognition and Communication, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
In this pre-registered experiment conducted in the Netherlands and Türkiye (Ntotal = 550), we investigated how the source of advice (peer vs. expert) influences people's decision-making when assessing the carbon footprint of a flight between two cities. We also examined whether this effect was influenced by their conspiracy mentality, collective narcissism, epistemic individualism, and climate change scepticism. Our findings suggest that people overall rely more on experts' advice than peers', especially in the Netherlands compared with Türkiye. Moreover, individuals high in conspiracy beliefs, epistemic individualism, and collective narcissism reduced the weight advantage typically given to expert advice over peer advice. Only a specific form of climate change scepticism (i.e., trend scepticism) showed similar effects. Overall, our results indicate that individuals who value their own opinion and harbour distrust towards experts or science tend to discount expert advice.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Fundamental Attribution Error
Correspondence Bias
The Availability Heuristic
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Self-Serving Bias

