Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Disparities in Diagnostic Utilization Patterns Between Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and
Kiki J Estes-Schmalzl1, Wondwossen T Lerebo2, Mitchell Wolden1
1Department of Health Sciences, University of Jamestown, Fargo, USA.
Insights
Diagnostic imaging disparities exist for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These inequities are driven by race, socioeconomic factors, and geography, impacting care access.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
- Health Equity
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of illness and hospitalization, with distinct HFpEF and HFrEF phenotypes.
- Disparities in diagnostic imaging utilization may lead to underdiagnosis and unequal care for HF patients.
- Understanding the influence of social determinants of health (SDoH) on diagnostic imaging is crucial for equitable care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate differences in combined diagnostic imaging utilization between HFpEF and HFrEF.
- To examine the impact of SDoH and hospital region on diagnostic imaging disparities in HF.
- To identify factors contributing to underutilization of diagnostic imaging in HF care.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cross-sectional study using the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
- Identified adult HF hospitalizations using ICD-10 codes.
- Analyzed associations between diagnostic imaging (echocardiography, MRI, cardiac catheterization) and patient/hospital-level factors using multivariable logistic regression.
Main Results:
- Low overall utilization of combined diagnostic imaging (1.72%) across 6.47 million HF admissions.
- Significant racial disparities observed: Black patients had lower odds for HFpEF diagnosis but higher odds for HFrEF diagnosis compared to White patients.
- Income, education, employment, and hospital region were significant predictors of imaging disparities; cardiac catheterization strongly associated with both HF phenotypes.
Conclusions:
- Marked disparities in diagnostic imaging for HFpEF and HFrEF are driven by race, socioeconomic status, and geography.
- Underutilization of essential diagnostic imaging persists, particularly among minoritized and disadvantaged populations.
- Targeted interventions are necessary to address diagnostic access barriers and promote equitable HF care.
Abstract:
Background Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and hospitalization, encompassing distinct phenotypes: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Disparities in diagnostic imaging may contribute to underdiagnosis and unequal care. This study evaluates differences in combined diagnostic imaging utilization between HFpEF and HFrEF, focusing on social determinants of health (SDoH) and hospital region. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Adults (≥18 years) hospitalized with HF were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. The primary outcome was receipt of any diagnostic imaging (composite of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and cardiac catheterization). We examined associations between imaging and patient-level (race, income, education, insurance, employment) and hospital-level (region) factors using separate multivariable logistic regression models for HFpEF and HFrEF groups. Results Among 6.47 million weighted HF admissions, 6.95% were HFpEF and 6.55% were HFrEF. Combined diagnostic imaging utilization was low overall (1.72%). After adjustment, Black patients had lower odds of HFpEF diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.84) but higher odds for HFrEF (aOR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.23-1.25) than White patients. Cardiac catheterization was strongly associated with both phenotypes (HFpEF, aOR 3.68, 95% CI: 3.62-3.73; HFrEF, aOR 6.23; 95% CI: 6.14-6.32; all p<0.001). Income, education, employment, and hospital region were all significant predictors of imaging disparities. Conclusion Marked disparities in diagnostic imaging exist for both HF phenotypes, driven by race, socioeconomic status, and geography. Despite the clinical importance of imaging, underutilization persists, particularly among minoritized and disadvantaged populations, exacerbated by structural barriers. Implementing targeted interventions to address diagnostic access is essential for equitable HF care.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

