Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Development of a novel risk model to predict CRPC progression following IMRT: Implications for tailoring treatment
Takashi Ogata1, Rihito Aizawa1, Hiroyasu Abe2
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Kyoto Japan.
Objectives:
To develop a novel risk score (RS) model to predict the probability of progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) (CRPC) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification, since accurate prediction of the clinical outcome of definitive radiation therapy for patients with high- and very high-risk PCa remains challenging due to its heterogeneity.
Materials And Methods:
We conducted a retrospective review of 600 patients with high- and very high-risk PCa treated with IMRT at our institution. They were randomly divided into discovery (n = 300) and validation (n = 300) cohorts. A predictive RS model was created using a dataset from the discovery cohort based on the following parameters: T-stage, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen and age at initiation of IMRT. The model was internally validated using a dataset from the validation cohort. RS was calculated using multivariable Cox regression analysis, and patients were categorized into low-risk, intermediate-risk or high-risk based on the value.
Results:
The median follow-up period of the 600 patients was 9.1 (IQR: 6.1-11.6) years. The 10-year CRPC-free rates for low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories were 100.0, 90.4 and 61.4% in the discovery cohort, respectively (p < 0.001). Such differences were reproduced in the validation cohort. Specifically, those rates for low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories were 96.4, 90.7 and 74.8% in the validation cohort, respectively (p < 0.001). Harrell's C-index for this model was 0.692, being higher than that of the NCCN risk classification (0.617).
Conclusion:
This RS model provided useful information to enable tailoring of the treatment intensity for this heterogeneous population.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022