Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

15.3K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
15.3K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.2K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.2K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

16.6K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
16.6K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.9K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

7.2K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Limits of Predicting Individual-Level Longevity: Insights From the U.S. Health and Retirement Study.

Demography·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Optimal pandemic control strategies and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the United States.

BMC global and public health·2025
Same author

Optimal pandemic control strategies and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the United States.

BMC global and public health·2025
Same author

Easily Computed Marginal Likelihoods from Posterior Simulation Using the THAMES Estimator.

Bayesian analysis·2025
Same author

A lentiviral vector B cell gene therapy platform for the delivery of the anti-HIV-1 eCD4-Ig-knob-in-hole-reversed immunoadhesin.

Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development·2023
Same author

Robust Mendelian randomization in the presence of residual population stratification, batch effects and horizontal pleiotropy.

Nature communications·2022
Same journal

A Tree Perspective on Stick-Breaking Models in Covariate-Dependent Mixtures (with Discussion).

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Coarsened Mixtures of Hierarchical Skew Normal Kernels for Flow and Mass Cytometry Analyses.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Inference for Spatial-Temporal Non-Gaussian Data Using Predictive Stacking.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

A Two-Component <i>G</i>-Prior for Variable Selection.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Logistic-Beta Processes for Dependent Random Probabilities with Beta Marginals.

Bayesian analysis·2026
Same journal

Gridding and Parameter Expansion for Scalable Latent Gaussian Models of Spatial Multivariate Data.

Bayesian analysis·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.4K

Causally Sound Priors for Binary Experiments.

Nicholas J Irons1, Carlos Cinelli2

  • 1Department of Statistics and Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Bayesian Analysis
|September 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed the BREASE framework for Bayesian analysis of clinical trials. This method improves understanding of treatment effects by considering baseline risk, efficacy, and side effects.

Keywords:
Binomial ProportionsGeneralized DirichletPotential OutcomesPrimary 62F15, 62F03secondary 62P10

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference
  • Clinical Trial Analysis

Background:

  • Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for evaluating treatment effectiveness.
  • Current methods often lack interpretability and flexibility in parameterization.
  • A need exists for robust Bayesian frameworks that incorporate clinical relevance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the BREASE (Baseline Risk, Efficacy, and Adverse Side Effects) framework for Bayesian analysis of RCTs.
  • To provide a flexible and interpretable Bayesian approach for binary treatment and outcome data.
  • To offer a generalized prior distribution that enhances causal inference in clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Parameterizing the likelihood using baseline risk, efficacy, and adverse side effects.
  • Utilizing a flexible, jointly independent beta prior distribution, a generalization of the Dirichlet prior.
  • Developing analytical formulae for marginal likelihood and Bayes factors.
  • Implementing an exact posterior sampling algorithm and a data-augmented Gibbs sampler.

Main Results:

  • The BREASE framework naturally induces prior dependence between treatment and control group outcomes.
  • Prior hyperparameters are directly interpretable, aiding prior knowledge elicitation and sensitivity analysis.
  • Analytical solutions and efficient MCMC algorithms are provided for complex cases.
  • Empirical examples demonstrate utility in estimation, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The BREASE framework offers a powerful and interpretable Bayesian approach for RCT analysis.
  • It enhances causal inference by providing clinically relevant parameterizations and flexible priors.
  • The framework facilitates robust estimation, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity analysis of treatment effects.