Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

40.3K
Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
40.3K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

43.5K
Overview
43.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

562
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
562
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.4K
Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius01:09

Bones of the Upper Limb: Radius

4.5K
The radius is longer of the two bones that make up the human antebrachium or forearm. At the proximal end, the radius articulates with the capitulum of the humerus and the radial notch of the ulna to form the elbow joint. At the distal end, the radius articulates with the ulna via the ulnar notch, forming the distal radioulnar joint. Distally, the radius also attaches to the carpal wrist bones (scaphoid and lunate) to form the radiocarpal joint.
The radius has a nail-shaped head, and a...
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediabetes as an Unrecognized Risk Factor for Inpatient Postoperative Complications after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery·2026
Same author

The Outpatient Surge in Total Hip Arthroplasty: National Trends in Volume Migration, Demographic Disparities, and Comorbidity Profiles (2019-2022).

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery·2026
Same author

Fibromyalgia as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The journal of knee surgery·2026
Same author

Rare tumour presenting as a cystic lesion in an infant.

BMJ case reports·2025
Same author

Strategies to Promote Health Equity for Orthopaedic Surgery Patients Who Speak a Language Other Than English.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same author

Strategies to Increase the Spanish-Speaking Workforce in Orthopaedic Surgery within the United States.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Accuracy and Reproducibility in Whole Bone Bending Tests
04:20

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Accuracy and Reproducibility in Whole Bone Bending Tests

Published on: September 1, 2023

1.4K

Inaccuracies in Orthopaedic Research Fellowship Applications: A Study on Authorship Misrepresentations.

Antonio Fernandez-Perez1, Jonathan M Stern1, Natalia Cruz-Ossa1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

JB & JS Open Access
|September 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Academic integrity is crucial in research applications. A study found 17.2% of orthopaedic research fellowship applicants misrepresented their publication history or authorship, impacting fair evaluations.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.8K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Accuracy and Reproducibility in Whole Bone Bending Tests
04:20

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Accuracy and Reproducibility in Whole Bone Bending Tests

Published on: September 1, 2023

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.8K
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Academic integrity is vital in scientific research.
  • Increasing competition may lead to inaccurate reporting of research contributions by applicants.
  • Orthopaedic research fellowships are valuable for medical students and graduates applying for residency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the frequency and types of misrepresentations in orthopaedic research fellowship applications.
  • To assess the impact of these misrepresentations on the evaluation and credibility of the selection process.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort analysis of 87 applications for adult reconstruction research fellowships over two cycles (2024-2025).
  • Curriculum vitae were cross-referenced with indexed databases to verify publication status and author order.
  • Misrepresentations categorized as publication discrepancies or exaggerated authorship positions; descriptive statistics and comparative analysis were performed.

Main Results:

  • 15.2% of applications (17.2%) contained misrepresentations.
  • Publication discrepancies were found in 9.2% of applications, and exaggerated authorship in 10.3%.
  • No significant differences in misrepresentation rates were found between medical students vs. graduates or US vs. international applicants.

Conclusions:

  • Discrepancies in self-reported research output among fellowship applicants raise ethical concerns about academic honesty.
  • Misrepresentations can undermine the integrity of the application process and fairness of candidate evaluation.
  • Implementing systems like ORCID could enhance transparency and accuracy in research reporting.