Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.1K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.1K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

607
The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
607
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

198
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
198
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity01:22

Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity

245
Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...
245

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attitudes and intentions toward prenuptial marriage contracts.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same author

Predicting relationship quality with itself? A single general factor captures most of the variance across 34 common relationship measures.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Turning Down, Tuning In: How Mindfulness Shapes Sexual Rejection, Relationship Satisfaction, and Sexual Satisfaction.

Journal of sex research·2025
Same author

Partner (in)congruence in gender role attitudes and relationship satisfaction.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference matching.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

How Do Invested Partners Become Invested? A Prospective Investigation of Fledgling Relationship Development.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.1K

Pseudo Effects: How Method Biases Can Produce Spurious Findings About Close Relationships.

Samantha Joel1, John K Sakaluk1, James J Kim1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Western University.

Psychological Science
|September 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Method biases can inflate relationship research findings. A new study introduced "Pseudo" evaluations, finding they predict relationship satisfaction, highlighting the need for rigorous psychometric standards.

Keywords:
construct validityinterpersonal relationshipsmeasurementmethod biasesrelationship qualitysentiment override

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.1K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Interpersonal relationship research often uses self-report measures.
  • Shared method biases can inflate associations between relationship measures.
  • These biases are often overlooked in measurement validation and hypothesis testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of method biases on relationship research.
  • To introduce and examine a novel construct, "Pseudo," to capture these biases.
  • To assess if "Pseudo" predicts genuine relationship constructs.

Main Methods:

  • A dyadic longitudinal study was conducted.
  • A new construct, "Pseudo," was developed using irrelevant relationship evaluations.
  • The association between "Pseudo" and common relationship measures was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • "Pseudo" showed moderate associations with common relationship measures like satisfaction and commitment.
  • "Pseudo" predicted these relationship measures three weeks later.
  • Results indicated "Pseudo" captures method biases, specifically sentiment override.

Conclusions:

  • "Pseudo" evaluations serve as a proxy for method biases in relationship research.
  • Sentiment override, the tendency to project global sentiments, is a key bias identified.
  • More rigorous psychometric standards are essential to differentiate true constructs from methodological artifacts.