From didactic classrooms to computer-assisted-simulated teaching-learning strategy: impact on knowledge outcomes in...

The amphibian dissection for medical students was halted by the restrictions imposed by the national regulatory guidelines, prompting medical curricula to revise and innovate instructional methods. Hence, there is a critical need for potential innovative solutions to enhance students' understanding of physiological concepts. Therefore, this study aimed 1) to evaluate the gain in knowledge and retention with computer-assisted simulation (CAS) versus traditional teaching (TT)-learning strategies in first-year medical and paramedical students, and 2) to obtain students' and faculty feedback about strengths and limitations of both strategies. Medical and paramedical students, with prior theoretical knowledge, were separately randomized into CAS or TT groups after consenting. Knowledge gain and retention were assessed using multiple-choice questionnaires before, immediately after, and 15 days postexposure. Faculty and student feedback on the strengths and limitations of the teaching-learning strategies was collected. Results showed similar knowledge gain in both CAS and TT groups for medical students (CAS: 16.76 ± 3.69; TT: 15.94 ± 3.75; P < 0.001), with significantly better retention in CAS (16.10 ± 3.40) compared to TT (13.38 ± 3.21; P < 0.001). For paramedical students, knowledge gain was comparable, but retention was reduced in CAS (9.60 ± 2.23) compared to TT (10.35 ± 1.76; P < 0.05). Students appreciated the use of CAS program and suggested a blended learning module. In conclusion, integrating a blended learning module (CAS and TT) into the undergraduate curriculum can be an effective alternative to enhance knowledge gain and retention.NEW & NOTEWORTHY With amphibian dissection being restricted, simulation studies are crucial. This study compared computer-assisted simulation (CAS) to traditional teaching (TT), evaluating knowledge gain and retention. CAS proved effective in enhancing knowledge gain and retention. Students provided feedback on the strengths and limitations of both methods and suggested a blended approach (CAS and TT) would better cater to diverse learning needs. This approach offers a promising solution, leveraging the benefits of both methods to optimize student learning outcomes.