Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Surgical options for correcting refractive surprise after cataract and lens surgery: review and meta-analysis
Piotr Kanclerz1, Natasza Bazylczyk, Idan Hecht
1From the Helsinki Retina Research Group, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (Kanclerz, Hecht, Tuuminen); Hygeia Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Gdańsk, Poland (Kanclerz, Bazylczyk); Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Hecht); Department of Ophthalmology, Shamir Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel (Hecht); Eye Centre, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland (Tuuminen).
Topic:
To compare the outcomes of surgical approaches to correct ametropia after cataract and lens surgery.
Clinical Relevance:
Despite advancements in the field of biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas, complete elimination of refractive surprises after cataract and lens surgery is impossible. Preferred Practice Patterns acknowledges the possibility of refractive surprise after cataract surgery; however, no recommendations regarding the preferred treatment have been given.
Methods:
PubMed and Scopus were used to search the literature as of November 14, 2024. For the statistical analysis, the surgical options were divided into (1) corneal refractive surgery and (2) supplementary IOL implantation. Studies regarding IOL exchange have been mentioned; however, due to the insufficient total number of eyes, they were not included in the meta-analysis. Outcomes included postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) in diopters, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) expressed as logMAR.
Results:
The postoperative SE was significantly better in eyes after corneal refractive surgery (0.02; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.10) than after supplementary IOL implantation (-0.21; 95% CI -0.77 to 0.36; P < .0001). Furthermore, the postoperative UDVA was better after corneal refractive surgery (0.04; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.10), than after supplementary IOL implantation (0.12; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.28; P < .0001). Similarly, the postoperative CDVA was better after corneal refractive surgery (-0.01; 95% CI -0.06 to 0.04) than after supplementary IOL implantation (0.06; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.18; P < .0001).
Conclusions:
Corneal refractive surgery resulted in superior SE, UDVA, and CDVA, and should be considered the primary approach for treating refractive surprise after cataract and lens surgery.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
05:19Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Focusing of Light in the Eye