MiNEN, amphicrine carcinomas, and conventional carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation: diagnostic criteria, open questions, and future perspectives
- 1Institute of Pathology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. moritz.jesinghaus@uni-marburg.de.
- 2Institute of Pathology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
- 3Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- 4Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
- 0Institute of Pathology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany. moritz.jesinghaus@uni-marburg.de.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are aggressive tumors with distinct components. This review clarifies MiNEN diagnostic criteria and explores related entities like amphicrine carcinomas.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Pathology
- Cancer Biology
Background
- Mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are aggressive epithelial malignancies.
- MiNEN are defined by distinct, clonally related neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components, each ≥30% of tumor mass.
- Amphicrine carcinomas and conventional carcinomas with aberrant neuroendocrine markers present diagnostic challenges.
Purpose Of The Study
- To outline the current diagnostic framework for MiNEN.
- To examine classification boundaries of amphicrine carcinomas and conventional carcinomas with aberrant neuroendocrine expression relative to MiNEN.
- To identify unresolved questions for future diagnostic guidelines and clinical management.
Main Methods
- Review of current literature and diagnostic guidelines for MiNEN.
- Comparative analysis of MiNEN, amphicrine carcinomas, and conventional carcinomas with neuroendocrine features.
- Discussion of emerging technologies for classification and management.
Main Results
- Current MiNEN definition requires distinct components, each ≥30% of tumor mass.
- Amphicrine carcinomas and conventional carcinomas with neuroendocrine markers may not meet MiNEN criteria.
- Diagnostic criteria require refinement for clarity and consistency.
Conclusions
- Clearer diagnostic criteria are needed for MiNEN and related neoplasms.
- Further research and guideline updates are essential for accurate classification.
- Emerging technologies may improve diagnosis and management of these complex tumors.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

