Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 19, 2026

07:41
Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats
Published on: October 23, 2020
6.7K
Customizing AI-based screening with real-world data: Practical insights from diabetic retinopathy
Broder Poschkamp1, Liane Kantz2,3, Petra Augstein2
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Acta Ophthalmologica
|September 11, 2025
Summary
Real-world artificial intelligence (AI) screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) showed lower performance than expected, but customization improved accuracy. AI tools significantly reduced the need for ophthalmologist evaluations in diabetes care.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a primary cause of vision loss globally in adults with diabetes.
- Existing AI screening tools (IDx-DR, RetCAD) demonstrate high sensitivity in controlled settings.
- Real-world DR screening faces challenges with image quality and local healthcare adaptation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare AI algorithms (IDx-DR, RetCAD) for non-mydriatic DR screening against ophthalmologist mydriatic fundoscopy.
- To evaluate the impact of customized referral threshold modification ('Greifswald modification') on AI screening outcomes.
- To assess AI performance considering image quality and patient inclusion in real-world settings.
Main Methods:
- A one-centre observational study included 1716 patients with diabetes mellitus.
- Assessed sensitivity, specificity, ungradable image proportion, and reduction in ophthalmologic evaluations.
- Customized referral thresholds using the Youden Index for regression-based AI algorithms.
Main Results:
- High rates of ungradable images were observed (5.7% unacquired, 2.1% incomplete for IDx-DR).
- AI screening reduced ophthalmologic exam needs by 47.5% to 78.5%.
- Sensitivity varied: 70.4% (RetCAD) to 93.6% (RetCAD with Greifswald modification) for analysable images; 52.7% (IDx-DR) to 79.9% (RetCAD with Greifswald modification) including all patients.
Conclusions:
- Real-world AI DR screening performance can be lower than in controlled studies when including non-analysable patients.
- Regression AI algorithms allow referral threshold customization, enhancing screening accuracy.
- AI screening effectively reduces the clinical burden of DR evaluations in diabetes care.

