Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
Published on: September 2, 2020
Improved class separation by GC × GC of volatile hydrocarbons with an unconventional increase in the second dimension
H Potgieter1, E Rohwer2, T Joubert1
1Sasol Research and Technology, Sasolburg 1947, South Africa.
Abstract:
Light petroleum fractions are produced during crude and synthetic oil refining processes and are upgraded to useful products in various markets. These fractions are upgraded using various refining processes, and the characterization of these fractions is essential for process control and ensuring final product specifications. These light fractions can be very complex and multidimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) is used to characterise these complex samples. ASTM method D1319, Fluorescent Indicator Adsorption (FIA), is used routinely for the determination of the total volume percent of saturates, olefins and aromatics in petroleum fractions and is used in the certification of final gasoline products. There would be several advantages if chemical group-type separation for gasoline can be achieved on GC × GC. Even though excellent GC × GC chemical group-type separation has been achieved, the separation of ≤C6 aliphatics (alkanes, alkenes and cyclic alkanes) in light fuels like gasoline remains a challenge with insufficient resolution between these compounds. In this study, the GC × GC parameters for the optimum separation of the ≤C6 aliphatics were determined with group-type separation of light fuels in mind. The study showed that it is possible to achieve this separation under GC × GC wrap-around conditions whereby two modulations of analytes are moving through the second dimension column at any time, allowing for the use of 2 - 4 times longer second dimension columns. For the first time the optimum separation of the ≤C6 aliphatics were determined while maintaining good separation for the heavier hydrocarbons. Good GC × GC chemical group-type separation for gasoline samples was obtained with this method. Quantitative results, combined with bromine number analysis, compared well with the results obtained by the FIA method.
More Related Videos
11:44Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 6, 2016
07:49On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
Published on: August 5, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
SFC utilizes a supercritical fluid mobile phase,...
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...