Kinetic Characterization of Inhibition of Cathepsins L and S by Peptides With Anticancer Potential

Olga E Chepikova1, Victoria I Bunik2,3,4, Ivan V Rodionov4

  • 1Institute of Translational Medicine and Biotechnology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

Proteins
|September 11, 2025
PubMed

Insights

This study characterizes cysteine cathepsins L and S interactions with inhibitors. Findings reveal opportunities for targeted drug design based on cathepsin type and cellular location.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Pharmacology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Cysteine cathepsins are crucial in various pathologies, making them key therapeutic targets.
  • Inhibitors of cysteine cathepsins demonstrate potential in reducing tumor cell viability.
  • Understanding cathepsin L and S interactions is vital for developing targeted anti-cancer therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To kinetically characterize human cathepsins L and S interactions with a peptide substrate and two peptide inhibitors.
  • To investigate the influence of pH on cathepsin activity, substrate/inhibitor affinity, and inhibition mechanisms.
  • To explore the potential for differential targeting of cathepsins L and S in various cellular compartments.

Main Methods:

  • Enzyme kinetics assays were performed using human cathepsins L and S.
  • Interactions were studied with acetyl-QLLR-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (Ac-QLLR-AMC) substrate.
  • Peptide inhibitors FFSFGGAL (CS-PEP1) and acetyl-PLVE-fluoromethyl-ketone (Ac-PLVE-fmk) were evaluated under varying pH conditions (4.6, 6.5-7.0).

Main Results:

  • Both cathepsins exhibited higher catalytic activity at pH 6.5-7.0 compared to pH 4.6.
  • Cathepsin L showed higher affinity for the substrate and CS-PEP1 inhibitor than cathepsin S, irrespective of pH.
  • CS-PEP1 demonstrated mixed inhibition, while Ac-PLVE-fmk caused irreversible inactivation, with pH-dependent rates.
  • At pH 4.6, cathepsin L had higher affinity but slower inactivation by Ac-PLVE-fmk compared to cathepsin S.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides insights into the differential inhibition of cathepsins L and S by peptide inhibitors.
  • Findings support the development of cathepsin- and location-specific drug designs for therapeutic applications.
  • Optimizing inhibitor design based on pH-dependent interactions can enhance targeted therapy efficacy.