Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Corneal stability comparison between prophylactic cross-linking with laser refractive surgery technique versus laser
Shuang-An Yang1,2, Shiow-Wen Liou3, Chun-Chen Chen4,5
1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose:
To summarize whether corneal cross-linking (CXL) with laser refractive surgery improves corneal stability more than laser surgery alone for myopia.
Methods:
Five electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to Aug, 2023. Studies comparing the effects of prophylactic corneal CXL with laser refractive surgery technique versus laser refractive surgery technique alone in myopic eyes were included. The included articles regarding prophylactic CXL combination with laser refractive surgery technique, riboflavin was all delivered into the stroma with similar accelerated protocols (irradiance of 30mW/cm2 for 60-90 seconds). Primary outcome measures included post-operative changes of keratometry, refraction, corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, and both corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA/UDVA) as the surrogate parameters to corneal stability, measured from post-operative 1-12 and 1-24 months. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models, and potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analyses of surgery type and myopic level.
Results:
Twelve eligible studies with 1,252 eyes met our inclusion criteria. Compared to those receiving laser refractive surgery technique alone, patients who received prophylactic CXL with laser refractive surgery technique had significantly less UDVA and CDVA decrease within post-operative 12 months (UDVA:WMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.06-(-0.01), p=0.01/CDVA: WMD -0.01, 95% CI -0.03-(-0.00), p=0.02). Furthermore, patients with spherical equivalent -5.0 Diopter (UDVA:WMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.07-(-0.02), p<0.001/ CDVA: WMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.03-(-0.01), p<0.001) or receiving LASIK procedures (UDVA:WMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.06-(-0.01), p=0.01) were associated with more profound visual stability after prophylactic CXL.
Conclusion:
For visual outcome, prophylactic CXL with laser refractive surgery, compared to laser refractive surgery alone, provided more stability within post-operative one-year among myopic patients with comparable efficacy and predictability. Particularly, those with higher myopia or receiving LASIK procedure as refractive surgery benefited more from prophylactic CXL.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
12:25Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking TXL for Myopia
Published on: January 6, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...