Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025
Clinical Effect on Cortical Reactivity of Theta Burst Versus High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic
Jiajing Wu1, Sheng Zhuang1, Yinlian Han1
1Department of Neurology and Suzhou Clinical Research Center of Neurological Disease, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Background:
Both high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) are believed to enhance cortical excitability. However, clinical comparison of their benefits for motor improvement in Parkinson's disease (PD) as well as their underlying neurophysiological changes remain unelucidated.
Objective:
To compare the clinical effect of rTMS versus iTBS on motor improvement and explore their influence on cortical reactivity using resting state electroencephalogram (EEG) and TMS-EEG.
Methods:
Idiopathic PD patients were randomized in a single-blind, controlled trial, and received 10 sessions of either 10-Hz rTMS or iTBS applied to the bilateral primary motor cortex (M1). Motor symptoms were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Cortical reactivity was assessed by resting state EEG and TMS-evoked potentials.
Results:
Included were 52 PD patients (mean [SD] age 66.2 [5.8] years). Compared to 10 Hz rTMS, iTBS was more efficient in alleviating tremor symptoms. In the iTBS group, the global mean field amplitude of P60 was significantly higher after stimulation over contralateral M1 of the affected side and was inversely correlated with motor improvement. In the 10 Hz rTMS group, the global mean field amplitude of P30 evoked by ipsilateral M1 increased significantly. The combination of oscillation and connectivity of δ frequency in the frontal cortex of PD provided a decent model in predicting iTBS responders at baseline.
Conclusion:
Compared with high-frequency rTMS, iTBS applied to M1 was more effective in improving tremor symptoms in PD. The two non-invasive stimulation modalities appear to exert their effects through distinct neurophysiological pathways, as measured by EEG and TMS-EEG.
More Related Videos
08:50Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: August 20, 2019
07:42Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Published on: August 17, 2018